Sunday, July 28, 2024

Bread of Heaven (Proper 12B; with asides about Paris Olympics and Communion without Baptism)


 

Bread of Heaven

Proper 12B
28 July 2024; 10:00 a.m. Sung Mass

Homily Delivered by the Rev. Dr. Anthony Hutchinson

at the Church of the Holy Spirit, Sutherlin, Oregon

2 Kings 4:42-44; Psalm 145; Ephesians 3:14-21; John 6:1-21

 

God, take away our hearts of stone, and give us hearts of flesh. Amen.

 

Today’s reading from the Gospel of John tells us a story where five barley breads and two fish, once blessed by Jesus, feed over 5,000 people.  The story occurs in all four Gospels.   In Mark, Matthew, and Luke, the story demonstrates the power of Jesus and his role as Messiah.   In John, it forms part of that Gospel’s Book of Signs, a recounting of marvelous deeds by Jesus that point beyond themselves to inner, hidden truths about Jesus: turning water into wine shows he is the true Vine, multiplying the loaves shows he is the Bread of Life, curing the man born blind shows he is the Light of the World, and raising Lazarus from the dead shows he is the Life of the world.  

 

Jesus’ feeding of the 5,000 here is a sign pointing to and embodying the truth that Jesus is both nourisher and nourishment.    Right after this story, Jesus gives the sermon of the Bread of Life, where he says,  “I am the bread of life.  The one who comes to me shall not hunger.  The one who believes in me shall never thirst.  … I am the living bread come down from heaven.  Anyone who eats this bread shall live forever.  The bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh.  … Unless you eat of the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.  The one who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I shall raise him up at the last day” (John 6: 35-54). 

 

Where the Synoptics say Jesus took the loaves and fish and “blessed them and gave them” to the people, John alone uses the language, “he gave thanks and distributed” them.   Those words in John link this story to early Christian sacrament of the Eucharist, which, after all, means “Thanksgiving.”

 

St. Paul, writing about 25 years after the death of Jesus, described the origin of this sacrament in this way: “For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you: The Lord Jesus, on the night he was betrayed, took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, ‘This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me.’ In the same way, after supper he took the cup, saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant in my blood; do this, whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me.’  For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes” (1 Corinthians 11:23-26). 

 

Matthew, Mark, and Luke all follow Paul in this same basic story.  But John, for his part, does not tell of a Eucharist at the Last Supper, instead he tells of the washing of feet, the dipping of bread into the mezze sauce, and a long prayer of intercession by Jesus.  It is part of John’s general tendency to remove references to sacraments in stories about Jesus and replace them with stories and speeches that focus on their meaning.   Jesus never is pictured being baptized by John the Baptist in the Fourth Gospel; instead he works a sign by offering himself as “Living Water” to the Samaritan woman at the Well, teaching Nicodemus about birth “by water and by the spirit,” and having water flow from his pierced side on the Cross. 

 

Similarly, in John there is no Eucharistic prayer at the Last Supper.  Rather, the feeding of the 5,000 points to and embodies the fact that Jesus is the Bread from Heaven, which we must eat in order to have eternal life.

 

For what it’s worth:  in the Thirty-nine Articles of Religion that served as the basic confession of faith of Anglicans during the first 3 centuries of our existence, we read: “Holy Scripture containeth all things necessary to salvation: so that whatsoever is not read therein, nor may be proved thereby, is not to be required of any man, that it should be believed as an article of the Faith, or be thought requisite or necessary to salvation.”  The fact that John places inauguration of the Eucharist in a field with over 5,000 random people who may or may not have followed John the Baptist suggests that the Prayer Book Canon of absolutely requiring baptism before communion, no matter how well this supports baptismal theology, is perhaps an overstepping by liturgical legalists.


However that may be, the Bread of Life Sermon in John and the Last Supper narratives in Paul and the Synoptics brought the Church early on to recognize the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharistic celebration and in the consecrated bread and wine themselves.      

 

An early Christian hymn by Ephrem of Edessa, writing in a form of Aramaic in the fourth century expresses the wonder and reverence of this belief well: 


…In your bread, [Lord,] there blows what no mouth can devour.
In your wine there smoulders what no lips can drink.
Gale and Blaze in bread and wine: unparalleled the miracle we taste.

Coming down to earth, where human beings die,
God created these anew, like Wide-eyed Ones,
mingling Blaze and Gale and making these the mystic content of their dust.

Did the Seraph’s fingers touch the white-hot coal?
Did the Prophet’s mouth do more than touch the same?
No, they grasped it not and he consumed it not. To us are granted both.

Abram offered body-food to spirit-guests.
Angels swallowed meat. The newest proof of power
is that bodies eat and drink the Fire and Wind provided by our Lord.
                                          (tr. Geoffrey Rowell) 

 

We live today in an age where much of the wonder, awe, and reverence has been removed from life, a world where the realm of the sacred and holy is getting smaller and smaller.  And due to our past abuse of minorities and exclusion, the things we Christians hold as most sacred can become the butt of dirty jokes and parody, as we saw in the Olympics opening ceremony this week in Paris, where Leonardo’s Last Supper visually served as a pattern for a drag-queen Bacchanalia.   It probably serves us right, and is a joke that, I think, Jesus, joke-telling companion of drunkards and prostitutes, would have appreciated.  

 

But if we are to be fully human, and true to our nature, we must not lose our sense of the holy, our sense of reverence, and our ability to see the holy, to see divinity, in ordinary things of daily life, like bread and wine.

 

When I hear people mock belief in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist and reverencing its elements as superstitious “cookie worship,” I question their capacity to wonder or hold anything in awe or reverence.  Part of the problem, of course, is that some people do indeed have superstitious and magical ways of seeing the Eucharist.  “Hocus-pocus” as a way to mock such superstition is a corruption of the Latin translation of Jesus’ words when he instituted the Eucharist, “Hoc est corpus meum (This is my body).”  

 

But some peoples’ bad opinions or misuse of doctrine should not lead us to the opposite error of rejecting the true doctrines that can lead us to salvation.  We need to follow here the example of the young Elizabeth I, who affirmed her faith the Real Presence while declining to over-define the matter.  When queried under threat of possible torture or death as a heretic by Queen Mary’s inquisitors about her belief regarding the Eucharistic elements, Elizabeth referred to Jesus’ words “this is my body, this is my blood,” and replied with the ideas summed up in this quatrain: 

 

Christ was the word that spake it.
He took the bread and break it;
And what his words did make it
That I believe and take it.

 

Key in experiencing and honoring the presence of Christ in the Eucharist is having a general idea about what a sacrament is.  It is, just as in our Gospel story today, a sign, a symbol, an outward and visible expression of inward, hidden reality.  A symbol does not just point beyond itself to something else; it participates in and embodies the reality to which it points.  It makes the reality it indicates available to us by the very fact that it is there.   It is for this reason that any understanding of the Eucharist that does not encompass a belief in the real presence of Christ is to my mind flawed. 

It is hard to express the reverence and awe I feel at the presence of Christ in the sacrament.  But hymns, like the one of Efrem the Syrian I quoted earlier, manage at times to capture elements of this awe.  In the hymn, “Lord you give the great commission” we sing:  “Lord, you make the common holy, this my body, this my blood.  Let us all, for earth’s true glory, daily lift life heavenward.” 

 

When we pray the Lord’s Prayer, we ask “give us this day our daily bread.”  But this is not simply a prayer for basic physical sustenance.   The words translated by “our daily bread” actually mean something more like “our bread for the morrow,” the bread of the great feast on the Day of the Lord, or even “the bread beyond the one you meant when you said, ‘man shall not live by bread alone.’”  It is for this reason that the Lord’s Prayer has always been recited as part of the Great Thanksgiving, just before the breaking of the bread. 

  

I would invite all of you, this week, to remember to say the Lord’s Prayer at least once a day.  And when you say the words, “give us this day our daily bread,” think of the Bread of Life, come down from heaven. Think of Christ made present to us in God’s gifts of bread and the wine, at his table of plenty.  And then in your silent time, your private prayers, feed on him in your hearts by faith, and be thankful.

 

In the name of Christ, Amen.

 

Sunday, July 21, 2024

Our Peace (Proper 11B)

 


Our Peace

Proper 11B
21 July 2021; 9:00 a.m. Sung Mass

Homily Delivered by the Rev. Fr. Tony Hutchinson, SCP, Ph.D.,

at St. Luke’s Episcopal Church

Grants Pass Oregon

 

Jeremiah 23:1-6; Psalm 23; Ephesians 2:11-22; Mark 6:30-34, 53-56

 

God, take away our hearts of stone, and give us hearts of flesh. Amen.

 

 

“Remember that at one time you Gentiles by birth, … [were] aliens … and strangers to the covenants of promise…. But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. For he is our peace… he has broken down the dividing wall, … [Y]ou are no longer strangers and aliens, but citizens with the saints and also members of the household of God….”

 

Ephesians thus characterizes the effect of Christ’s victory over death on the cross on his world.  The idea is that by suffering and overcoming the worst that the wickedness of the world could throw at him, Christ brought peace to people far and near, and broke down the wall dividing groups.  Paul expressed the idea a little more expansively in Galatians:  “There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female; for all of you are one in Christ Jesus” (Gal 3:28).

 

The idea is profound—in Christ, all divisions and distinctions are healed, all differences blurred, polarities centered, dualities united.

 

It is so easy to divide the world into us and them.  Group identity is a cheap way of finding ourselves, and seeing only the good in us, at the expense of those not in our group.  It is a seductive way of making us forget our own failings by focusing on the failings of others.  Thinking that such divisions matter masks the truth that all of us are flawed, and that ultimately, we are all in this together. 

 

Think of the different groups into which we divide up the world.

 

Rich and poor. 

Black and white.

Saints and sinners.

Male and female. 

Cisgender and trans 

Jew and Gentile

Christian and pagan

High Church and Low Church 

Catholic and Protestant.

Straight and Gay.

Republican and Democrat.

MAGA Trumpist and Antifa Leftist

Native and foreigner.

 

 “Christ is our peace; in him, we are one.” 

 

Peace in Christ, however, is a starting point, not an end in itself.  It does not give us a ticket to pass by the process of amending past harms. 

 

Take one example—Race.  Martin Luther King said he looked forward to the day where his children would be judged by the content of their character, not by the color of their skin.  He wanted bigotry and hurt on the basis of race ended.  But this does not mean he wanted us to ignore the real-world conditions of people who still suffer from prejudice.   If Love sees no color, it also demands that we look at injustice based on color in the eye. In a world where many still feel the oppression and marginalization of personal racial bigotry or systemic preference given to some groups at the disadvantage of others, it means we must say things like “Black Lives Matter.”  

 

Remember the witty meme from a few years back:  Jesus leaves the 99 sheep off in search of the one that was lost.  Off to the side, a person points at Jesus and angrily screams, “All sheep matter!”  The point is not that Black people are wandering souls—they are not—but that Jesus taught us to take special care of those who are on the margins. 

 

We all try to divide people up, and often assigning good or evil to one group or the other. 

 

In the Harry Potter books, there is a clear struggle between good and evil, between Voldemort and Harry Potter, the Death Eaters and the Order of the Phoenix, Griffindor and Slitherin:  good guys and bad guys.  Yet at one point, Sirius Black tells his godson that one must not think that one group or person is purely good and another purely evil:  “We've all got both light and dark inside us. What matters is the part we choose to act on. That's who we really are.”

 

Ephesians is not saying that good and evil do not exist, or that we need not worry about struggling against evil.  But it is saying that divisions between groups often labeled as good and evil no longer matter in light of the cross.

 

There is a deep logic to this.  Community defines itself not just by who it includes, but also by who in excludes.  For this, Philosopher René Girard says that community is “unanimity minus one,” that is, a group united in accusing and expelling at least one of its own. Community is not just joined hands and linked arms of embrace.  It in its structure is also the pointing finger of accusation, of exclusion. Community regulates itself by scapegoating. 

 

Most primitive cultures have myths that express this. Generally an abnormal or impure member of the community is singled out, driven away, and often killed in the myth.  Thereby the community is made whole.  Impurity and wrong are thus purged.  

 

Our own Christian story turns this myth on its head:  the crowd points their fingers at Jesus and calls for his death, he is brutalized, taken outside the city walls, and killed.   But—and here’s the difference—Jesus is innocent.  It is he who is right, and the community that is wrong. Thus Ephesians: Christ on the cross preaches peace to those who are far off and those who are near.  The cross, that cruel tool the Roman Empire used to enforce community, that instrument of public terror supporting conformity, is undone by the resurrection of our Lord and becomes a sign of healing and unity. 

 

Christ, once driven outside the wall, becomes our peace, and breaks down all dividing walls.  He brings those far off, those driven outside the walls themselves, back, and draws them near.   

 

That’s what all the shepherd imagery in today’s other readings is about.   The kings of Israel, called the shepherds of the people, in today’s Hebrew Scripture lesson fail their flock by striving too hard to maintain its advantage over other nations, perhaps by scapegoating and strong-arm community enforcement. 

 

But Jesus sees the people as a flock without a shepherd, and steps up to feed and support them.  He brings them all together—regardless of their background—into a single fold.  He tends them not because they are his sheep and others are not, but because they need a shepherd.  And so he feeds them and serves them, regardless of their origins.

 

Where the Good Shepherd leads, division and strife, fear and loathing of the Other, are healed.  While not gone entirely, they are subsumed into peace and “righteousness,” or compassionate goodness.  I translate Psalm 23 this way: 

 

1It is Yahweh who is my shepherd;

      I need nothing else.

2Green are the pastures where God has me lie. 

      Still are the waters where God guides me.

3God refreshes my life.

      And by God’s own nature leads me in compassionate paths. 

4Though I must trudge through even the darkest deadly chasm,

 I shall not fear any harm; 

      Because You are with me; 

      Your crook and walking-stick give me comfort, not hurt. 

5You spread out a great feast for me

Even when faced by persecutors. 

      You pour calming lotion on my head;

      The cup before me overflows with wine.

6Surely Your kindness and compassion will chase after me as long as I live,

      And it is in Your house that I will make my home forever.

(Psalm 23 TAB)

 

The cross undoes not just the mutual accusation between groups.  The division within ourselves that each of us experiences, the sense of not being worthy, of not being a “good person,” is also undone.  The fact is, most of our accusations we hurl at others are projections of the very faults we ourselves suffer from.  We are responsible for the narratives we bear in our hearts and tell our fellows about those we identify as “other.”  Paul says Jesus “erased the record against us from all legal demands. He set this aside, nailing it to the cross”  (Col. 2:24).  He thus destroys the alienation within each of us because of the accusation built into our individual lives. 

 

Even in this, “Christ is our peace; in him we are one.”  The cross and resurrection tell us that we ought not accuse ourselves or others.  They tell us that we are one, that we are beloved. 

 

I am so thankful for the reconciliation the Gospel, the Happy Announcement, brings.  My husband Will and I are very similar in many ways, but are poles apart politically in this very divided time.  If we had not been taught the Church that Jesus truly did erase divisions, we may not have been able to see beyond our differing opinions on policy and talk and listen enough to know how our deep values are identical.  Our differences in how to seek them and apply them stem from the differences in our life arcs, not from some irreconcilable existential schism.  I am so happy our Bishop has been so firm in witness to acceptance beyond our party or sect.  I am so thankful our out-going Presiding Bishop has taught again and again that if it’s not about love, it’s not about God.  I am so grateful that the Church ihas always taught that God is love, and where true love is, God himself is there. That doesn’t mean the messiness of life and its divisions don’t exit—but it does mean that Love in the end, and maybe even right here and right now, will conquer all.   

 

Loved ones, alienation is real, whether between groups or within our hearts. We are all strangers and foreigners.  We try to make ourselves feel better about it by clinging to our group, our family, our tribe, defined in part by making strangers and foreigners of others.   We accuse scapegoats or blame enemies for our very own crimes; we also accuse ourselves as desolate losers.  Those political and religious leaders who milk such alienation to gain power and wealth are guilty of great sin.  For Jesus took this all with him outside the wall, and it died with him.  In the light of Easter morning, we can see that it is all a sham. 

 

In Christ, we are one.  In Christ, we are no longer strangers and foreigners.  He has broken down the dividing wall, and has nailed the accuser’s power itself to the cross.   He is our peace. 

 

Thanks be to God.