A
Holy Lent
Fr.
Tony’s Letter to the Trinitarians
March
2019
Observing
Lent was the first step I took in leaving the Mormonism of my youth and
embracing Anglican Catholicism. I
usually give up all meat for the Lenten fast, and find the discipline not only
improves my spiritual life, but also makes my eating and cooking more
intentional, and with this intentionality, better. I like meat, and was profoundly grateful to
learn that Lent is the 40 days before Easter exclusive of Sundays.
Sundays, as little weekly Easter Feasts themselves, are not subject to
the normal fasting rules of Lent. And so
if I began to feel a bit protein starved mid-Lent, I came to appreciate this
“day of rest” from my Lenten discipline.
Steak on Sundays—yum, yum.
Abstaining
from meat, alcohol, tobacco, or caffeine, however, is not what Lent is
about. It is about the change imposed by
any such discipline. Imposing change on
ourselves is intended to give us new eyes to see things, new hearts to feel and
experience our lives.
Irving
Babbitt (1865-1933), founder of the neo-humanist movement in education and
criticism, and one of T.S. Eliot’s mentors and teachers, wrote,
“That man is most human who can check his faculty, even if it be his master-faculty, and his passion, even his ruling passion, in its mid-career, and temper it by its opposite” (Literature and the American College, p. 57).
Such self-correction for Babbitt rested in a careful balance of emotion
and reason, of things old and things new.
Babbitt applied this to our
social and political arrangements in a democracy:
“If we are told that it is not democratic to strive to produce the superior man, we should reply with Aristotle that the remedy for democracy is not more democracy, but that, on the contrary, if we wish a democracy that is to endure we should temper it by its opposite—with the idea of quality and selection. True democracy consists not in lowering the standard but in giving everybody, as far as possible, a chance of measuring up to that standard” (“English and the Discipline of Ideas,” The English Journal 9:2 [Feb., 1920], p. 65.)
Tempering
our default selves, our regular perceptions and values, and our habitual way of
acting and being—tempering these by their opposites—is what Lent is about. Madeleine L’Engle expressed it thus:
For Lent, 1966It is my Lent to break my Lent,To eat when I would fast,To know when slender strength is spent,Take shelter from the blastWhen I would run with wind and rain,To sleep when I would watch.It is my Lent to smile at painBut not ignore its touch.It is my Lent to listen wellWhen I would be alone,To talk when I would rather dwellIn silence, turn from noneWho call on me, to try to seeThat what is truly meantIs not my choice. If Christ’s I’d beIt’s thus I’ll keep my Lent.
I
invite all of us to the observance of Holy Lent. I encourage us to stretch ourselves—our
minds, hearts, bodies, and sensibilities—by intentional going off our normal
paths. Each one of us is unique, and so
that means that we each need to find the controlling faculties and passions we
have that we need to temper with their opposite.
Grace
and Peace,
Fr.
Tony+
No comments:
Post a Comment