Wednesday, February 5, 2020

Apologies and Non-Apologies (Midweek Message)




Apologies and Non-Apologies
Fr. Tony’s Midweek Message
February 5, 2020

It is a good rule in life never to apologize.  The right sort of people do not want apologies, and the wrong sort take a mean advantage of them. 
~P.G. Wodehouse, The Man Upstairs

A stiff apology is a second insult.... The injured party does not want to be compensated because he has been wronged; he wants to be healed because he has been hurt.
 ~G.K. Chesterton

Never ruin an apology with an excuse. 
~Kimberly Johnson

True remorse is never just a regret over consequence; it is a regret over motive. 
~Mignon McLaughlin, The Neurotic's Notebook, 1960

Most of us have heard the term “non-apology apology.”  It means when someone goes through the motions of saying they're sorry for something but in the process actually does the opposite of apologizing.  We all can think of governmental leaders, from both sides of the political spectrum, caught in wrong doing, who try to manage things by issuing what their press team calls an apology, but ruin it by saying things like “I’m sorry you got your feelings hurt,” or “I regret the consequences of my action.”  Or they deny wrong-doing altogether, while appearing to penitently address the problem.  Almost always, the motive is to manipulate things so that the lawyers don’t get involved: the wrong-doer thinks, “if I admit wrongdoing here, that will be taken as evidence of guilt or liability when this goes to court.” 

Examples are many:  think Bill Clinton’s initial reactions to Monicagate, our current President’s almost pathological inability to admit fault, the Japanese government’s repeated statements of “sympathy” for victims of sex-slavery in World War II, or the U.S. government’s own efforts to manage public relations fall out from atrocities in the many wars it has waged over the last half-century.   We often hear from company customer service teams “We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.”  All such “apologies” seem to never be accepted as apologies, and for good reason.

Inter-personal counselors, sociologists, and trained peace builders all know that “I’m sorry you got your feelings hurt” feels like an additional assault to the one victimized by the wrong-doing—the wrong in the situation is seen as a mere artifact of the victim’s imagination or excessive sensitivity.  What was meant to sound like an apology in essence is an accusation of fault, further shaming and blaming the victim. 

People who have looked carefully at this in a variety of cultures and settings agree that for an apology to truly be heard as an apology and have any hope of building reconciliation or restoring relationships, it must have certain common elements: 

1)    An admission of fault and guilt that accepts responsibility for the wrong-doing, without seeking any mitigating excuses or shifting of responsibility. Naming the wrong-doing specifically helps us weed out fake apologies:  we say we're sorry only for the things for which we had responsibility.   This takes away the insincerity that cheapens our "I'm sorries" and just encourages our victims to think, "there he goes again!" 
2)    A confession of what specifically was wrong in the action, i.e., what values or moral principles shared by the wrong-doer and the victim were violated.  Clearly stating what was wrong in what one did and admitting it is essential in accepting responsibility.  Naming specifically what was wrong in the act helps establish common ground with our victim--we can at least agree on what was wrong in what we did rather than blaming each other for vaguely defined wrong.  Words of explanation here can help clarify our motives and intentions, but only if they do not pour salt on the wound by trying to avoid responsibility. 
3)    An expression of remorse for the wrong-doing and the real harms caused the victim.   "I regret I hurt you" passes muster here; "I'm sorry you allowed your feelings to be hurt" does not.   
4)    Sincere efforts at restitution or righting the harms done, or if such is not possible, asking what the victim believes might help make things better. 
5)    A commitment to pursue such restitution, and an affirmation that the wrong, if continuing, will stop immediately, and a firm undertaking that it will not be repeated (expressed, again, in specifics rather than vague abstractions).  
In essence, for an apology to work as an apology, the wrong-doers must cast themselves on the mercy of the victims, without excuse, explanation, or trying to manipulate things and wriggle out of the problem.   If this is not the basic transaction, then what you are pursuing is not an apology.  It is a further assault.    
Jesus calls us to be peace-makers.  Jesus calls us to seek reconciliation.  He calls us to love our enemies and pray for those who harm us.  Learning how to take responsibility for our misdoings and apologize sincerely, learning how to make amends, and if amends are not possible to at least sincerely seek forgiveness, is the first step of following Jesus in the messy areas of human relationships. 

Grace and Peace,
Fr. Tony+

No comments:

Post a Comment