Thursday, December 22, 2011

Rorate Caeli Desuper (Advent 4)

William Dunbar (1460-1520)

Rorate Caeli Desuper
Last Week of Advent (last week before Christmas Day)

Spending Christmas in Seattle this year, and enjoying the balmy weather and occasional day of rain, I am not thinking so much of Irving Berlin's "I'm Dreaming of a White Christmas," but rather an older text, the so-called "Advent Prose," the Latin chant for the conclusion of Advent, "Rorate Caeli Desuper ("Drop Down, O heavens, From Above.")  It dreams of a rainy Christmas rather than a snowy one.

The text begins with a citation from Isaiah 45:8: "Drop down, ye heavens, from above, and let the skies pour down righteousness: let the earth open, and let them bring forth salvation, and let righteousness spring up together; I the LORD have created it." The image in Isaiah is that of the rain-laden winds of late winter, a harbinger of Spring and provider of desperately needed water.

The overall text of the Advent Prose is a stringing together of passages from the Hebrew Scriptures expressing the hopes of the prophets for Yahweh's salvation at the end of time, when all would be set right:  
   
Latin English
Roráte caéli désuper,
et núbes plúant jústum.
Drop down ye heavens, from above,
and let the skies pour down righteousness:
Ne irascáris Dómine,
ne ultra memíneris iniquitátis:
ecce cívitas Sáncti fácta est desérta:
Síon desérta fácta est:
Jerúsalem desoláta est:
dómus sanctificatiónis túæ et glóriæ túæ,
ubi laudavérunt te pátres nóstri.
Be not wroth very sore, O Lord,
neither remember iniquity for ever:
the holy cities are a wilderness,
Sion is a wilderness,
Jerusalem a desolation:
our holy and our beautiful house,
where our fathers praised thee.
Peccávimus, et fácti súmus tamquam immúndus nos,
et cecídimus quasi fólium univérsi:
et iniquitátes nóstræ quasi véntus abstulérunt nos:
abscondísti faciem túam a nóbis,
et allisísti nos in mánu iniquitátis nóstræ.
We have sinned, and are as an unclean thing,
and we all do fade as a leaf:
and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away;
thou hast hid thy face from us:
and hast consumed us, because of our iniquities.
Víde Dómine afflictiónem pópuli túi,
et mítte quem missúrus es:
emítte Agnum dominatórem térræ,
de Pétra desérti ad móntem fíliæ Síon:
ut áuferat ípse júgum captivitátis nóstræ.
Behold, O Lord, the affliction of thy people
and send forth Him who is to come
send forth the Lamb, the ruler of the earth from Petra of the desert to the mount of the daughter of Sion
that He may take away the yoke of our captivity


Consolámini, consolámini, pópule méus:
cito véniet sálus túa:
quare mæróre consúmeris,
quia innovávit te dólor?
Salvábo te, nóli timére,
égo enim sum Dóminus Déus túus,
Sánctus Israël, Redémptor túus.
Comfort ye, comfort ye, my people,
my salvation shall not tarry:
why wilt thou waste away in sadness?
why hath sorrow seized thee?
Fear not, for I will save thee:
for I am the Lord thy God,
the Holy One of Israel, thy Redeemer.

To hear the plainsong tone to which this text is chanted, see
                                         https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f06qdhO_sEY

One of my favorite Christmas carols is a macaronic (mixed Latin and vernacular) carol written in Scots dialect by William Dunbar that cites the plainsong chant and several other snippets of Latin liturgical texts used in the Advent and Christmastide seasons:

On the Nativity of Christ 
William Dunbar (1460-1520)
(Court Poet to James IV of Scotland)
Rorate coeli desuper! 
Hevins, distil your balmy schouris! 
For now is risen the bricht day-ster,    
Fro the rose Mary, flour of flouris:    
The cleir Sone, quhom no cloud devouris,        
 Surmounting Phebus in the Est,    
Is cumin of his hevinly touris:      
Et nobis Puer natus est.   

Archangellis, angellis, and dompnationis,    
Tronis, potestatis, and marteiris seir,  
And all ye hevinly operationis, 
Ster, planeit, firmament, and spheir,    
Fire, erd, air, and water cleir, 
To Him gife loving, most and lest,    
That come in to so meik maneir;  
Et nobis Puer natus est.   

Synnaris be glad, and penance do,    
And thank your Maker hairtfully; 
For he that ye micht nocht come to    
To you is cumin full humbly  
Your soulis with his blood to buy 
And loose you of the fiendis arrest—    
And only of his own mercy;      
Pro nobis Puer natus est.   

All clergy do to him inclyne,  
And bow unto that bairn benyng, 
And do your observance divyne    
To him that is of kingis King:    
Encense his altar, read and sing 
In holy kirk, with mind degest,  
Him honouring attour all thing 
Qui nobis Puer natus est.   

Celestial foulis in the air,    
Sing with your nottis upon hicht, 
In firthis and in forrestis fair  
Be myrthful now at all your mycht; 
For passit is your dully nicht, 
Aurora has the cloudis perst,    
The Sone is risen with glaidsum licht,      
Et nobis Puer natus est.  

Now spring up flouris fra the rute, 
Revert you upward naturaly, 
In honour of the blissit frute    
That raiss up fro the rose Mary;    
Lay out your levis lustily,  
Fro deid take life now at the lest 
In wirschip of that Prince worthy      
Qui nobis Puer natus est.   

Sing, hevin imperial, most of hicht!    
Regions of air mak armony!  
All fish in flud and fowl of flicht    
Be mirthful and mak melody!    
All Gloria in excelsis cry! 
Heaven, erd, se, man, bird, and best,—    
He that is crownit abone the sky
Pro nobis Puer natus est!

 
My adaptation for use by modern English speakers
Rorate coeli desuper!(1)
Heavens, now distil your balmy showers;
For now is risen the bright Daystar,
From the rose Mary, flower of flowers:
The clear Sun, whom no cloud devours,
Surmounting Phoebus (2) in the east,
Is come down from His heav’nly towers,
Et nobis puer natus est. (3)

Archangels, angels, dominions high
Thrones, powers, saints, and martyrs fair,
Stars, planets, firmament and sky,
All dwellers of the heavenly sphere,
Fire, Earth, air, and water clear.
To Him give loving, most and least,
That came in such a meek manner;
Et nobis Puer natus est.   

Sinners be glad, and penance do,
And thank your Maker heartfully;
For He that ye might not suffer so,
To you is come now, fully humbly,
Your souls with His blood to buy,
And loose you of the fiend’s arrest,
And only for His own mercy;
Pro nobis puer natus est. 

You ministers now turn your mind
And bow you to that child so kind,
And do your observance divine,
To Him who is of all kings the King:
Incense his altar, read and sing,
In holy Church with hearts at rest,
Him honoring above all things,
Qui nobis puer natus est.

Celestial fowls in the air,
Sing with your notes upon the height,
In straits and bays and forests fair
Be mirthful now at all your might;
For past now is your dark dull night;
Aurora (4) has the clouds pierced,
The sun is risen with gladsome light,
Et nobis puer natus est.

Now spring up flowers from the root,
And sprout green upward naturally,
In honor of the blessed fruit
That rose up from the rose Mary;
Send out your leaves lustily,
From death take life now at the least,
In worship of that Prince worthy,
Qui nobis puer natus est.

Sing, heaven imperial, most of height,
Regions of air make harmony,
All fish in flood and fowl of flight,
Be mirthful and make melody;
All Gloria in excelsis cry,
Heaven, earth, sea, man, bird and beast;
He that is crowned above the sky
Pro nobis puer natus est.

(1) "Drop down, heavens, from above." The beginning of the Latin introit for the fourth Sunday of Advent, taken from a prayer for winter rain which in the the book of Isaiah serves as a prayer for the arrival of God's day of salvation.   
(2) The Sun
(3)For/ and/ who  unto us a boy is born
(4)The Dawn

This poem is most often sung to this tune:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ht1Udu0099o

Sunday, December 18, 2011

Two Stories, One Gospel (Advent 4B)

 
Two Stories; One Gospel
18 December 2011
Fourth Sunday of Advent (Year B)
Seattle, Washington 

2 Samuel 7:1-11, 16; Psalm 89:1-4, 19-26; Romans 16: 25-27; Luke 1: 26-38

God, take away our hearts of stone and give us hearts of flesh. Amen.


In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent by God to a town in Galilee called Nazareth, to a virgin engaged to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David. The virgin's name was Mary. And he came to her and said, "Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with you." But she was much perplexed by his words and pondered what sort of greeting this might be. The angel said to her, "Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And now, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you will name him Jesus. He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his ancestor David. He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end." Mary said to the angel, "How can this be, since I am a virgin?" The angel said to her, "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be holy; he will be called Son of God. And now, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son; and this is the sixth month for her who was said to be barren. For nothing will be impossible with God." Then Mary said, "Here am I, the servant of the Lord; let it be with me according to your word." Then the angel departed from her. (Luke 1:26-38)



God, take away our hearts of stone and give us hearts of flesh. Amen.


Christians at this season are all accustomed to seeing nativity scenes and stage representations showing the baby Jesus in a manger surrounded the shepherds and the Magi, with the heavenly choir and the star of wonder, star of might, floating awesomely in the night sky above.    Today’s Gospel reading starts a cycles of Christmastide readings on the birth of Jesus that we tend to hear through the filter of this familiar scene. 


But the scene as such is not a scriptural scene.  It is the combining of two separate stories about the birth of Jesus Christ found respectively in Matthew 1-2 and Luke 1-2.  Just as it is necessary to distinguish between the two different accounts of the creation of the world (Gen 1:1-2:4a, and Gen 2:4b-3:24) in order to understand them as they were originally intended, it is helpful to look at each of these stories  about the birth of Jesus separately in order to see clearly what they are trying to teach us about Jesus 

Matthew’s story includes the Magi and the Star, but no angelic choir, stable and manger, or shepherds.  Matthew is richly embroidered with allusions to the Hebrew Scriptures, and uses imagery to develop the meaning of Christ’s ministry.  Joseph is the main character of the story.  He is a dreamer, like the Genesis patriarch Joseph (with his many-colored or long-sleeved cloak) (cf. Matt 1:20, 24; 2:13; and Gen 37:5,9,19; 41:15).  Like Joseph of old, he saves his family (indeed, all Israel) by going into Egypt (cf. Gen 45:4-8; Hos 11:1; Matt 2:14-15).  Likewise, the Magi are reminiscent of the non-Israelite prophet Balaam of Numbers 22-24.  They are mysterious gentile astrologers or Zoroastrian priests (the most evocative translation I have seen of what the word means and evokes in Matthew is “wizards”).  The star they follow as a literary symbol itself occurs as the star of Jacob in the oracle of Balaam originally intended as a prophecy about David’s victory over Edom and Moab (Num 24:17-19).  Just as the eventual acceptance of Christianity by the gentiles is hinted at by the gentile wise men on their knees before the newborn King, so also is Jewish officialdom’s rejection of Jesus, as well as the Cross, foreshadowed by King Herod’s attempt to kill the baby by ordering a general massacre.  Matthew’s portrayal of the massacre of  the innocents itself is an echo of the Hebrew Scriptures:  Herod plays Pharaoh to a new Moses, sent to deliver his people from bondage and bound to give them a new law in five books (the five sermon-plus-narrative blocks in Matthew’s Gospel).  Thus Matthew reveals Jesus as the fulfillment of all Jewish hope, using texts and images from the Hebrew Scriptures. 


Luke has passed on to us the story of the shepherds, stable, and angelic choir.  A much longer story than Matthew’s, it has Mary as the main character, and sets Jesus and John the Baptist in parallel by casting them as distant cousins and telling of their births and the angelic announcements of their mothers’ pregnancies.  Luke clearly teaches that the Baptist is but a forerunner and servant of Jesus.   Songs and hymns with rich allusions from the Hebrew Scriptures (like the Magnificat in Luke 1:46-55, and the Nunc Dimmittis  in Luke 2:29-32) are woven into the narrative.   The conception and birth of John seems modeled on the story of the conception and birth of judges and heroes like Sampson and Samuel.  The story of the presentation of Jesus in the Temple, though it seemingly gets details of Jewish Law and practice wrong, is aimed at helping establish a continuity between the worship and religion of the Hebrew Scriptures and hope fulfilled in the person of Jesus.  The story of the stable emphasizes the humility of Jesus, and ties him with the figure of Israel’s God as a loving shepherd (Psalm 28:9; 78:72) or with Isaiah’s remark “The ox knows its master, the donkey its owner’s manger, but Israel does not know, my people do not understand” (Isa 1:3).  This all emphasizes his humanity, while the annunciation by an angel, and the rejoicing of the angelic choir at his birth emphasize his divinity.  Luke takes his narrative up to the time Jesus is twelve, with the story of the visit of Jesus to the Temple and being lost by his parents (Luke 2:41-52). 


 The two stories can be combined only by ignoring details in each of them.  Matthew seems to assume that Mary and Joseph live in Bethlehem, for when the wise men arrive, they come to their house there (Matt 2:11).  After fleeing to Egypt, when Joseph is told to return home, he heads for Bethlehem, but decides because of a further dream telling him about the continuing bad political situation there that he needs to bypass Judea and Bethlehem and set up a new home in Nazareth in Galilee (Matt 2:19-23). Nazareth, after all was the town that Jesus was publicly known to have come from, though Bethlehem had been associated with hopes for the birth of a new Davidic King already for several centuries.  Luke, for his part, sees Mary and Joseph living in Nazareth and makes literary use of a famously known census at about the time of Jesus’ birth (he almost certainly has gotten its date wrong) to move Mary and Joseph down to Bethlehem, filled to over-flowing and with no room for the holy couple and the soon-to-be-born baby.  After the appearance of the shepherds, Mary and Joseph go on an apparently leisurely trip to Jerusalem for the presentation of Jesus in the Temple, after which they return directly to their home in Nazareth.  Luke’s story would seem to preclude Matthew’s references to Herod’s plot to kill the baby Jesus and the family’s subsequent flight into Egypt.  Matthew’s story would seem to preclude the immediate return to Nazareth from Jerusalem which Luke recounts. 

There are ways of forcing the two stories together into harmony, to be sure.  One is to follow Luke’s story up to right after the presentation in the Temple, then assume an otherwise unmentioned return to Bethlehem and the leasing of a house there, where two years later the Wise men show up.   Similarly, some people account for the differences in the stories by suggesting that Matthew’s version is based on Joseph’s recollections while Luke’s is based on Mary’s.  But it is hard, if not outright impossible, to see how the harmonized story, if original, became fragmented and turned out the way the stories show up in the Gospels themselves, simply passing in the night and not really telling the same story at all. 

As a result of this, most scholars today believe that there is a lot of legendary material in these chapters.  Some conservative scholars argue that Matthew and Luke’s shared details—Jesus’ irregular conception and birth in Bethlehem rather than Nazareth—could conceivably stem from pre-Gospel oral traditions rooted in the experiences of the players in the stories.  Most scholars, however, simply write off any historical basis of the first two chapters of both Matthew and Luke and rather focus on their theological symbolism rather than their possible historical claims. 

Remember that the Gospel of Mark says that the “beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ” is the preaching of John the Baptist (Mark 1:1); Mark has no infancy narrative.  And even in Matthew and Luke, there seems to be little connection between the story of Jesus' public ministry and these early birth narratives (John the Baptist appears as a distant figure in the later chapters of Luke, not as a cousin.)  And the Gospel of John is also without an infancy narrative.  Rather it has as its start the great hymn to the Pre-existent Logos, where the Word comes down from heaven, and is made flesh (John 1).  Elsewhere, John actively argues that it does not matter where Jesus’ earthly origins were (what matters is his heavenly origin), and even suggests that insisting on Bethlehem as the Messiah’s origin is a misunderstanding (John 7:27-29, 41-43). 

Both Matthew and Luke agree that Jesus was Son of God from his conception, and they both foreshadow the worship of Jesus by people who accept him and the demeaning and crucifixion of Jesus by those who reject him.  Because of the bodily reappearance of Jesus after his death, the earliest Christians accepted him as uniquely God's agent.  But they saw problems in saying that he was the Messiah during his life, since the historical Jesus did not fulfill the exact hopes people had for the Messiah.  So some of the earliest Christians had believed that Jesus would be appointed Messiah as of the Second Coming (Acts 3:20).  Later, St. Paul believed that Jesus was constituted as Son of God as of his being raised from the dead after his crucifixion (Romans 1:1-4).  The earliest Gospel, Mark, places it as of his baptism in Jordan by John the Baptist (Mark 1:11, esp. in the Western Manuscript tradition, where the words “this day I have begotten you” are added).   Matthew and Luke separately make the great leap in Christian faith by saying that Jesus had always been uniquely God’s chosen one, from the moment of his conception.  It is only on the basis of their confession that a generation later, John can say that Jesus was not Christ as of his conception, but rather from the very beginning of creation (John 1:1).  The Nicaean Creed, the formulations of the Council of Calcedon, and the Creed of Athanasius in the centuries to follow only developed these basic themes further. 

So when we see these mixed crèche images of bits from Matthew and Luke together, let us remember that it is the person of Jesus that is the key issue, not the details of these specific stories.   Christ is alive and is at work in our hearts, minds, and actions of service and love.   Christ is God made manifest to us, God’s perfect revelation.  Jesus is uniquely God's child.  These stories give us partial images and reflections of this overwhelming truth. 

Thanks be to God. 

In the name of Christ, Amen.

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Via Media Holidays



Via Media Holidays
re-posted from The Trinitarian December 2011
(Parish Newsletter of Trinity Episcopal Church, Ashland Oregon)
 
A few years ago one of my friends, a bartender who was very much a professional and proud of his profession, gave me an interesting but troubling factoid. 

“What day of the year, do you suppose, is the biggest sales day for bars, pubs, and taverns in the United States?” 

“I don’t know,” I replied, “I’d guess maybe New Year’s Eve or St. Patrick’s Day?” 

“Wrong,” he said, “New Year’s Eve, most people are going to parties that night and not to bars, though it is a very heavy night at bars because of loners who don’t have parties to go to or people who want to top up before they go to parties.  Only a portion of the population celebrates St. Patrick’s.  The heaviest night of the year, surprisingly, is the Wednesday evening before Thanksgiving Day.” 

“How could that be?”


“Just think about it a minute.  Thanksgiving is the holiday for all Americans, not just Christians, not just Irish Americans and Irish American wanna-be’s.   College kids, young professionals, and even some middle-agers, both with and without young families, are all headed back to the family manse to be with their parents or in-laws, and with siblings.  Often it’s to celebrate the holiday with people they’d rather not spend time with.   Older parents are about to have their calm, happy, empty nests invaded by the offspring they finally succeeded to launch on separate living arrangements.  All those nervous, slightly discontented people head to the bars with spouses, partners, or friends for one last chance to get loaded before they descend into a day or two of the Hell of Bringing Up Father or the Brady Bunch!  They drink at bars because they can’t drink at home, either because they’re traveling or they’re already uncomfortably on stage at where they are spending the holiday.”

This sad factoid gave me a perspective on the holidays I had never had.

There are many reasons to love the season, but there are also tensions.  The holidays bring with them a whole lot of expectations, what we need to do, who we need to be with, what we ought to do, to properly celebrate and to not give offense.  The holidays can bring us face-to-face to our own failings, those places where we do not measure up, either to the expectations of others or to our own.   
Ten years ago, Jo Robinson and Jean Staeheli published their little book, Unplug the Christmas Machine: A Complete Guide to Putting Love and Joy Back into the Season.  They discussed how our expectations could distract us and ruin the season, and how a simpler celebration could help fix matters.  It is still a good read with a lot of good suggestions for having a joyous, and even holy, festival.  

We must not beat ourselves up over the fact that we have not simplified enough.  That too is an expectation that produces unhappiness.   The point is that we need to pace ourselves, and truly celebrate in ways that bring joy to us and to those about us.  

The Feast of the Nativity, or Christmas (Christ’s Mass), is the Feast of the Incarnation, of God becoming truly human.   By becoming truly human, God tells us that it is O.K. to be not O.K., and shows us that acceptance of who we are and who those about us are is the starting point of spiritual progress.    Jesus liked a good party, but did not want party planning to control life.  Note that in the story of the wedding at Cana, he provides hundreds of gallons of the finest wine to the joy of the guests, but also questions his Mother’s desire to control every little detail. 

Anglicans and Episcopalians have always held to the Via Media, the middle way, whether between Catholicism and Protestantism, the traditional and the innovative, or smoky and clangy High Church ceremony or snake-belly low, hands-in-the-air come-to-Jesus Evangelicalism.    Treading the path between two extremes in order to be as inclusive and as comprehensive as possible is the hallmark of English Prayer-book Christianity. 

We need to walk a middle path in our approach to celebrating the holidays too. 

We often hear this time of year calls to “put Christ back in Christmas.” People complain about commercialization, too much partying, and not enough praying.  This phrasing of the question gets the issues all wrong. It separates the partying and celebration from spirituality. Granted, some people see the holiday solely as a consumer or marketing event. The holiday is thus diminished, often becoming a source of stress and depression.

The problem, however, is not too much celebration, but too little. “I will greatly rejoice in the LORD, my whole being shall exult in my God” says Isaiah. It is not just “the spiritual side” of us that should rejoice. To want to turn Christmas into a sectarian prayer meeting rather than the public, boisterous, and commonly shared party that it currently is—for both believer and unbeliever—stems from bad theology.  Incarnational theology demands that our prayer be common prayer, or prayer in community, and our holidays be publicly shared. 

The fact that in the Western catholic tradition we observe a light penitential season, Advent, just before Christmas helps us moderate having too much fun in the run up to Christmas.  The fact that we celebrate the nativity of Christ for twelve full days, Christmastide, from December 25 to January 6, forces us to pace and moderate the celebration.

Elena and I will be arriving in Ashland on December 30, and look forward to starting our lives together with you before Christmastide is over. 

Let’s all get through the holidays in one piece, happy, but rested as well.   

Peace and Merry Christmas. 

Father Tony+


Tuesday, December 6, 2011

St. Nicholas of Myra (Dec. 6)


Nicholas of Myra (6 December A.D. 343) 

Nicholas was Bishop of Myra (in modern-day Turkey), and died 6 December 343 CE.  He is known to have suffered torture and imprisonment during the persecution under the Emperor Diocletian, and likely was one of the holy fathers attending the First Ecumenical Council of Nicaea in 325, which sought to resolve the Athanasian and Arian controversy over the nature of Christ's divinity.

Manifold popular legends about Nicholas, whose name in Greek means "Victory to the People," ensured that he would be seen as an intercessor for those in need of help, especially children and the exploited.


One story recounts that during a terrible famine,  a greedy and hurtful butcher lures three young boys into his house, where he slaughters and butchers them, putting their body parts in a barrel of brine to cure, hoping to make hams for sale.  Saint Nicholas, arriving to care for his hungry flock, immediately recognizes what had happened.  He then proceeds miraculously to reconstitute, reconstruct, and raise from the dead the three boys, bringing the Sweeney Todd-like butcher to repentance in one version, or a horrible and just punishment and death in another.

In the most well-known legend,  a man has three daughters whom he cannot marry off because he is too poor to pay a dowry, and in desperation is on the point of having the girls become prostitutes as a means of providing money for their food.  Nicholas, hearing the tale, arrives by night (to save the man public humiliation of accepting assistance) and throws three bags of gold, or three coins, over the wall to provide the girls with dowries.  The three bags have become the three spheres marking pawn shops, and the night-visiting savior of children or giver of gifts to children has become Sinterklaas or Santa Claus.


In another story, the Bishop asks for grain from a ship in port to help feed the starving city.  When the ship finally arrives at its destination, the original weight of the grain is still in the holds, despite the substantial gift. 

Nicholas is thus the patron and protector of sailors and children, as well as merchants, archers, students, thieves, prostitutes, and (perhaps through reputational transference from these last two) broadcasters.  He is patron of Albania, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Georgia, the Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Belgium, France, the Netherlands, and Portugal. 

Collect

Almighty God, in your love you gave your servant Nicholas of Myra a perpetual name for deeds of kindness both on land and sea: Grant, we pray, that your Church may never cease to work for the happiness of children, the safety of sailors, the relief of the poor, and the help of those tossed by tempests of doubt or grief; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Comfort, Comfort My People (Advent 2B)


Comfort, Comfort My People

Second Sunday of Advent (Year B)
 Isaiah 40:1-11; Psalm 85:1-2, 8-13; 2 Peter 3:8-15a; Mark 1:1-8
Homily delivered at the Congregation of the Good Shepherd
Beijing China
4th December 2011: 10:00 Holy Eucharist

God, take away our hearts of stone and give us hearts of flesh. Amen.

The year 2011 has been hard on many of us here in the Congregation of the Good Shepherd.  While our multi-national, multi-denominational composition is a point of joy for us—we have Americans, Canadians, New Zealanders, Australians, British, Bahamians, Fijians, Guyanians, Japanese, Chinese, and many more—it does make us a bit vulnerable as a group when bad things happen over the globe.  In March there was the horrible Christchurch New Zealand earthquake and its aftershocks.  Right after that, there was the horrendous earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear reactor crisis in Sendai Japan.   In August, we had major rioting, looting, and burning in London, Bristol, Birmingham, and Liverpool. 

In addition to these catastrophic disasters, we as a group faced other problems.  Several members of the congregation were diagnosed with major illnesses.  The political process of China seems to be hunkering down in reaction to the popular uprisings in the Middle East and in preparation for changes in the top Chinese leadership next year.  As a result, in the cooperation projects and business for which many of us are here for, it has become hard to move things forward. The entire world continues to suffer from a depressed global economy, and some of our congregants have had to split up their families on a temporary basis in order to pursue their livings in separate locations where the work is. In November, people from the United States sorrowfully commemorated the tenth anniversary of the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, and in so doing were brought face to face with the cost of how the American public and it political leaders reacted to that attack:  two seemingly unending wars on foreign soils have produced such deficits that the nation seems unable to respond to the economic crisis.  The American political process has become paralyzed, the constitutional government of the land seemingly moribund due to entrenched ideologies and an unwillingness to cooperate or compromise with anyone of differing opinions.   The Tea Party demonstrated on the Right and was met with hoots of derision from the Center; Occupy Wall Street demonstrated on the Left and was met with beatings, arrests, and pepper spray. 

Despite the occasional moments of grace and blessing we also have experienced, all told, I think that we can agree that 2011 has indeed been an annus horribilis, a year to make one's skin crawl, if only for the catastrophes we saw.  





In 587 BCE, a great catastrophe befell the people of the tiny kingdom of Judah.  One of the world’s first trans-national Empires, Babylon, after a decade of dealing patiently, in their lights, with the fanatic and ultra-nationalistic people of Judah, came down hard. After killing all insurgent combatants and activists, they deported the entire ruling class of the nation, letting them off with their lives but placing them far away in secure and safe provinces in Mesopotamia far from where they could do any damage by stirring up opposition to the Imperial rule. They blinded the king they had put on the throne of Judah only ten years before, only to be rewarded by his treachery and disloyalty. They placed another puppet, this time non-royal and hopefully compliant, in the role of governor of the now newly-named province of Judah.  They burned the capital city, Jerusalem, and leveled to its foundation the symbol of the obstinate, uncompromising national religion that had in some ways been the driving force in the rebellion of the district, the Temple of the Jews’ God, Yahweh.  No stone was left standing on another stone. 

This was a disaster of overwhelming and unfathomable proportions.  They had believed that Yahweh had promised to protect his people them and keep them from harm.  He had promised, they thought, to protect and preserve the line of the kings descended from David and protect their rule.  Now all that was gone. 

They had tried to keep God’s commandments, and in the very doing of this had provoked the wrath of the Babylonians.  Judah had ceased to exist.  All that was left was a small group of exiles in Babylon and a large mass of “the people of the land” living under foreign domination and rapidly accommodating and assimilating to ways of the occupiers in order to get by.   The Jewish way of worship had ceased; the Temple was a mere memory.  Almost all families had lost members, if not been wiped out entirely. 

It is hard for us to understand how hopeless and desperate this situation was.  It was as if all of New Zealand had been leveled, or all of Honshu wiped off the face of the earth by a tsunami, or if the terrorists had exploded nuclear bombs instead of crashed airplanes over New York City and Washington DC.  Arguably, the disaster facing the Jews in 587 was greater than even that of 70 C.E. when the Romans leveled Jerusalem or in the 1940s when the Nazis systematically sought to exterminate all European Jewry, 

Such was the level of desperation and hopelessness.   The nation simply didn’t exist any more.  God had broken the covenant with his people.  Indeed, they were no more his people, no more even a people.  And he was no more their God.  How could one understand these events any other way? 

Among the exiles in Babylon was a prophet who wrote in the tradition of Isaiah, and whose oracles have been preserved in the latter part of that book.  In the midst of that national disaster, he wrote: 

Nahumu, nahamu 'ommi, “comfort, comfort my people.”

The Hebrew is a soft, lilting, lullaby.  It is a plural command—“you all go out and comfort them, comfort them, for they are still my people. I am still their God.”  Thus begins the Book of Consolation in the larger book of Isaiah.

The words are achingly beautiful and full of love.  “Speak tenderly to Jerusalem, and call out to her.   She has served her time in prison; her penalty is paid.  Her suffering is so great that it cannot be the mere punishment for past sins—it is at least twice as worse as that.”  

This Second Isaiah then introduces several separate oracular pronouncements as the different voices giving this message of comfort. 

The first proclaims that as low as things have gotten, Yahweh is about to perform the ultimate turning of the tables by wondrously and unexpectedly bringing about the return of the exiles from Babylon to Judah.  God will do the seemingly impossible—he will turn the impassible barriers between Mesopotamia and Judah into the route of return. Metaphorically, the hill and canyon filled desert where Jordan, Syria, and western Iraq currently lie will be leveled into a smooth highway that will speed the exiles’ return.  And this will be a sign of God’s glory not just for Jews, but for all of humanity:


A voice cries out:
‘In the wilderness prepare Yahweh’s road,
make straight in the desert a highway for our God.
Every valley shall be lifted up,
and every mountain and hill be made low;
the uneven ground shall become level,
and the rough places a plain.
Then Yahweh’s glory shall be revealed,
and all people shall see it together,
for the mouth of Yahweh has said it.’
  The God who is to do this is no tribal deity, no special possession of the Jewish people.  A second voice of comfort takes up this theme of God’s universal nature, of the fact that all humanity stands in awe of God’s mystery, by surprisingly adding: 


‘All people are grass,
their constancy is like the flower of the field.
The grass withers, the flower fades,
when the breath of the LORD blows upon it;
surely people are grass.
The grass withers, the flower fades;
but the word of our God will stand forever.’


Note that Second Isaiah’s message is NOT: “ The national disaster was God’s just punishment on us and now he will restore us to our former state.  We will be his people and he will be our God, and all our enemies will now get their just deserts and it will be a great thing to be a Jew.”   

Rather, Second Isaiah’s message is: “Our suffering was beyond anything just.  It is a mystery, just as God is a mystery.  But our suffering is part of what it means to be human.  All of humanity suffers.  We are grass.  We are impermanent.  But God’s word remains, and that for all people.” 

It has always struck me as odd that Second Isaiah here thinks that a voice of joyful news would cry out, “All people are grass.  They wither in a day, and fade.”  What good news is there in such a saying? 

Accepting our common humanity and our facing square-on our limitations is actually a very liberating thing.  It is, in fact, good news.  It is the start of all authentic spiritual growth and health.  It is the thing that makes Socrates a wise man and the sophists around him foolish—he at least knows and accepts that he is ignorant while they go about in self-delusion.  It is the process that Buddhists call giving up desire, abandoning the expectations that enslave us, and the start of the process of enlightenment.  It is the start of what Muhammad called Islam, “submission” to God.  It is what the wisdom tradition in the Hebrew scripture calls the “beginning of all wisdom,” “awe or fear of the Lord.”   For those following Twelve-Step spirituality, it is the First Step, “we admitted we were powerless and that our lives had become unmanageable.”  It is what Jesus is describing when he says we must first lose our lives in order to find them. 

Acceptance of our condition as imperfect, limited, and very temporary people living in an imperfect and sometimes horrifying world is needed to break down the barriers between us and other people.  It is at the heart of the process of repentance, of regretting and turning aside from our misdoings, and performing amendment of life. 

I think that is why St. Mark in today’s Gospel says that John the Baptist’s preaching of repentance was the “Beginning of the Happy Message” of Jesus Christ.  Mark sees John as the “messenger sent before the Lord’s day,” borrowing from Malachi, and as, borrowing from today’s reading from Second Isaiah, the voice in wilderness crying “prepare the way.”   John, as dour and unsparing as we usually like to think him, is still a bringer of Good News, because he urges us to accept that we are helpless and hopeless, and this universally so, since all people for him needed his baptism, regardless of their heritage, religion, or family background. 

But acceptance is only the start.  In order to find the hope and help we lack, we need to turn our lives over to this God who breaks down barriers, smoothes down the barriers and fills up the gaps, makes the rough places plain, recreates the broken nation, and raises the dead to life. 

The third oracle in today’s Isaiah passage fairly sings in joy of what it means when we recognize God’s hand in these loving acts of restoring the exiles.  Second Isaiah personifies the City about to be rebuilt by the returning exiles, Jerusalem built on Mount Zion, itself as a herald of joyful news, the joyful news of God’s love:   


Get you up to a high mountain,
O Zion, herald of good tidings;
lift up your voice with strength,
O Jerusalem, herald of good tidings,
lift it up, do not fear;
say to the cities of Judah,
"Here is your God!"
See, Yahweh God comes with might,
and his arm rules for him;
his reward is with him,
and his recompense before him.
He will feed his flock like a shepherd;
he will gather the lambs in his arms,
and carry them in his bosom,
and gently lead the mother sheep.


Second Isaiah here takes the commonplace image used by the Hebrew prophets, the image of the coming day when Yahweh will set things right, by rewarding the righteous and punishing evil-doers, and changes it drastically.  No longer is this a day that burns.  No longer is it a great day of military conquest.  It is a day of gentle love.  It is a day that God as a loving shepherd feeds his flock, and carries the little lambs tenderly in his arms.  “Here is your God,” he says, implicitly saying “and not in those images of blood and fire.”  For Second Isaiah, God is a loving shepherd, not a warrior or executioner.

The season of Advent is a season of preparation and waiting.  We await and prepare for the inbreaking of God, for the coming of Christ, whether once long ago in Bethlehem, or soon in glory to finish setting things right.   The traditional prayer for the season is this:

Almighty God, give us grace to cast away the works of darkness, and put on the armor of light, now in the time of this mortal life in which your Son Jesus Christ came to visit us in great humility; that in the last day, when he shall come again in his glorious majesty to judge both the living and the dead, we may rise to the life immortal; through him who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever. Amen.

As we prepare, let us remember Second Isaiah’s message in today’s Hebrew Scripture reading:  we are all grass, and quickly fade.  But God loves us.  The coming of God to set things right is a moment of comfort, a moment of joyful news, not just for some, but for all.  It is a moment when God as a mother sings lullabies to us, her children, and when God, as a gentle shepherd, carries us in love, his lambs.

Sisters and brothers here at the Congregation of the Good Shepherd.  Elena and I have been blessed for the last 2 ½ years to be part of you, to sing and worship with you, and to serve you.   We are blessed to share the celebration of the first part of this Advent season with you.  We will be moving to Ashland Oregon in just a couple of weeks, for new ministry and new blessings.  I want to thank all of you for the great faith you have shared with us, and for the opportunities you gave us here to serve. 

May we all during the rest of this Advent season reflect on our limitations and failings, and be brutally honest about this with ourselves.  And may we see this, together with God’s offer to help us, as the gladdest of tidings, the best of good news.  And may we, in our lives and service, be heralds of this joyful message to all whom we meet. 

In the name of God, Amen.

Sunday, November 27, 2011

St, Andrew's Day (Nov. 30)

 
St. Andrew the Apostle, 30 November


The next day John [the Baptist] was there again with two of his disciples.  When he saw Jesus passing by, he said, “Look,  the Lamb of God!”   When the two disciples heard him say this, they followed Jesus.  Turning around, Jesus saw them following and asked, “What do you want?”   They said, “Rabbi” (which means “Teacher”), “where are you staying?”   “Come,” he replied, “and you will see.”  So they went and saw where he was staying, and they spent that day with him. It was about four in the afternoon.
Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother, was one of the two who heard what John had said and who had followed Jesus.  The first thing Andrew did was to find his brother Simon and tell him, “We have found the Messiah” (that is, the Christ).  And he brought him to Jesus.  Jesus looked at him and said, “You are Simon son of John. You will be called Cephas” (which, when translated, is Peter).  (John 1:35-40)

In the Eastern tradition, Andrew is often called “the first-called (protokletos)” because of this story in the Gospel of John, where Andrew and the unnamed John (the Beloved) are described as disciples of John the Baptist who first became followers of Jesus.  Andrew is the one who introduces his brother Simon Peter to Jesus.   Andrew and Peter were both fishermen from Capernaum, who were called by Jesus to become “fishers of people.”  

The name Andrew is actually a Greek name, meaning “manly.”   A measure of the degree of intra-cultural mingling and convergence in the mixed populations of Galilee of the period is found in the popularity of such Greek names for Jewish boys there.   This, even in the presence of wildly popular but such stridently nationalistic Jewish names such as Simon, Judas (Judah), and Jesus (Joshua).  
 
Later in John’s Gospel, when a group of Greeks (or Greek-speaking Jews) wish to speak with Jesus, it is Philip and Andrew they approach, both disciples with Greek names (John 12:20-22; “Philip” means “horse lover”). 

Earlier in John, when Jesus realizes the crowds are hungry just before he feeds the Five Thousand, it is Andrew who introduces him to a boy nearby by saying, "Here is a lad with five barley loaves and two fish." (Jn 6:8f)

Andrew appears in all the various lists of the Twelve given in the New Testament, but these three passages in John are the only places where we see Andrew as an individual.  In each, he is portrayed as introducing people to Jesus.  As a result, he is seen as the archetype of the Christian missionary or evangelist.  The Fellowship of Saint Andrew among Episcopalians today is devoted to encouraging personal evangelism, bringing of one's friends and colleagues to a knowledge of Christ.

Since Andrew is seen as the first of the Apostles, his feast on November 30 marks the beginning of the Church Year. The First Sunday of Advent is defined as the Sunday on or nearest the Feast of St. Andrew.  This day is effectively the fourth Sunday before Christmas Day.  


In early Church tradition, Andrew preached in Asia Minor and along the Black Sea, and was martyred by crucifixion in Greece.  Tellingly, later tradition describes him not nailed to a Latin cross, like Jesus, but rather, tied to an X shaped cross (a “saltire”), where he valiantly preaches for two days before expiring. 

When the Emperor Constantine in the 4th century set up his new capital Constantinople at Byzantium, the bishopric of the new city needed the cachet and authority of an appeal to apostolic tradition like those of the other major metropolitan sees or patriarchates.  Rome and Antioch both claimed that their churches had been founded by Peter and Paul; Alexandria, Mark, Peter’s assistant and scribe; Jerusalem, all the Twelve as well as James the brother of the Lord. The Patriarch of Constantinople reached back to the traditions of Andrew preaching along the Black Sea and the Bosporus to claim such status for his see.  The great Byzantine preacher John Chrysostom said that thus Andrew, the first-called of the apostles, the “Peter even before there was a Peter” founded what he claimed was the preeminent Patriarchate in the Church. 

Since missionaries went far and wide from Constantinople, soon Andrew was claimed as patron saint of Ukraine, Romania, Russia.   In the early Middle Ages, a missionary named Rule brought some of Andrew’s relics to Scotland, to a town known as Fife, but which he rechristened as St. Andrew's, where there is now the oldest and most famous course for Scotland’s national sport, golf.   Andrew thus became the patron saint of Scotland in addition to the Greek Byzantine heritage countries where he himself had been a missionary.   


The white X shaped saltire “St. Andrew’s Cross” on a blue field is the design of the Scottish national flag.  The St. Andrew's cross appears in the Union Jack of Great Britain behind the red X shaped cross of St. Patrick of Ireland and the regular +-shaped red cross of St. George, patron saint of England.


Most Merciful God, you make yourself known in the lives and examples of your saints.  Bestow on us, we pray you, the courage and loving friendly concern of your first apostle, Andrew, that we, like him, may stand as constant witnesses of your love, grace and truth, and bring our friends and colleagues to the knowledge and love of Jesus Christ your son our Lord, in whose name we pray.  Amen. 

Thursday, November 10, 2011

Veterans' Day 2011

 
Veterans’ Day 2011
Beijing, China 

November 11, 1918 “on the eleventh hour of the eleventh day, of the eleventh month” marked the signing of the armistice ending the “Great War,” of 1914-18,  “the war that no one wanted,” “the accidental war,” that started the 20th Century with the mechanized slaughter that resulted in 15 million deaths and 20 million wounded.  Since the U.S. commemoration of “Armistice Day” was transformed by President Dwight D. Eisenhower after the second World War into a general commemoration of U.S. military veterans in any armed conflict, we Americans often forget  the significance of this particular day.

Canadians and the British still preserve it as “Remembrance Day” with a heavy emphasis of the sacrifice and ideals of WWI, together with its futility.  The wearing of red poppies is a major part of the commemoration, bringing to mind the poem by Canadian Lieutenant Colonel John McCrae beginning “In Flanders Fields, the poppies blow, between the crosses, row on row.”

Since Australians and New Zealanders lost most of their people in that conflict in the battle of Gallipoli (a failed effort to capture Constantinople from the Ottoman Turks), they commemorate the anniversary of the start of that battle, April 25, as Anzac Day (after the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps, which was decimated in the battle). 

When I was a young man living in the North of France, I had the occasion to visit several of the sites of the trench warfare in the Flanders Fields during World War I, including Verdun and Vimy Ridge.   
Verdun is where German and French soldiers faced off against each other in pitched trench warfare for most of the year 1916, firing about 40 million artillery shells at each other, killing 306,000 young men and maiming about a half million more.  It was the longest and one of the most devastating battles in the history of warfare, which ended as a minor French tactical victory but overall was a costly strategic stalemate.


The site of the battle is to this day a tortured, scarred landscape with overlapping crater upon crater caused by the burst of artillery shells.  Though now it is covered with green grass and is no longer the sea of mud and blood you see in the old photographs, you cannot go off of the marked roads and paths because the area still contains hundreds or thousands of mines and unexploded ordnance.


The battlefield cemetery there has a large memorial, the base of which is an ossuary—a mass grave for the bones of the dead, since thousands were recovered only in pieces. 

The Canadian cemetery at nearby Vimy Ridge, with its preserved trenches, graves, and haunting memorial with tower-like pylons and the overwhelmingly sorrow-filled statue of Canada Bereft, of a mother mourning her dead sons, is, one of those few places on earth, like Auschwitz, the Road of No Return (for Slaves) in Benin, the Choeung Ek "Killing Fields" Memorial in Cambodia, or the Memorial to the Victims of the Rape of Nanjing in Nanjing China, that brings a traveler face to face with great historical horror, overpowering and dreadful.

 
The U.S. “Flanders Fields” Cemetery across the border in Belgium is less theatrical in its presentation, but every bit as moving.

In the U.S., Veterans’ Day has become part of the Civil Religion.  I read a Facebook posting this morning:  “On Thanksgiving Day we thank God for our blessings; on Veterans’ Day, we thank him for those who fought and died for our blessings.”    In the degree that we thereby honor the dead, this is right and fitting.  In the degree, however, that we thereby celebrate the system of power and policy that produces such things as the “Great War” (or, indeed, that calls any war “Great”), the day is diminished and cheapened. 

Friends from New Zealand recently gave me the gift of sharing with me some recent Church music coming from their homeland.  One of my favorites is the following piece written for Anzac Day: 
A Hymn for Anzac Day

Honour the dead, our country’s fighting brave,
honour our children left in foreign grave,
where poppies blow and sorrow seeds her flowers,
honour the crosses marked forever ours.
Weep for the places ravaged with our blood,
weep for the young bones buried in the mud,
weep for the powers of violence and greed,
weep for the deals done in the name of need.
Honour the brave whose conscience was their call,
answered no bugle, went against the wall,
suffered in prisons of contempt and shame,
branded as cowards, in our country’s name.
Weep for the waste of all that might have been,
weep for the cost that war has made obscene,
weep for the homes that ache with human pain,
weep that we ever sanction war again.
Honour the dream for which our nation bled,
held now in trust to justify the dead,
honour their vision on this solemn day:
peace known in freedom, peace the only way.

Music: © Colin Gibson 2005 Words: © Shirley Erena Murray
Tune: ANZAC 2005
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8EhR44SUp4