Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Joy in Leviticus (midweek message)


 Simchat Torah 2, Chana Helen Rosenberg, 2015

Fr. Tony’s Mid-week Message
Joy in Leviticus
April 27, 2016

The reading from the Hebrew Scriptures in today’s Daily Office is from Leviticus: 

Yahweh spoke to Moses in these words: Speak to all the people of Israel gathered together and say to them: You shall be holy, for I Yahweh your God am holy.  You shall each revere your mother and father, and you shall keep my sabbaths: I am Yahweh your God. Do not turn to idols or make cast images for yourselves: I am Yahweh your God. When you offer a sacrifice of well-being to Yahweh, offer it in such a way that it is acceptable on your behalf.  It shall be eaten on the same day you offer it, or on the next day; and anything left over until the third day shall be consumed in fire. If it is eaten at all on the third day, it is an abomination; it will not be acceptable.  All who eat it shall be subject to punishment, because they have profaned what is holy to Yahweh; and any such person shall be cut off from the people. When you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap to the very edges of your field, or gather the gleanings of your harvest.  You shall not strip your vineyard bare, or gather the fallen grapes of your vineyard; you shall leave them for the poor and the alien: I am Yahweh your God. You shall not steal; you shall not deal falsely; and you shall not lie to one another.  And you shall not swear falsely by my name, profaning the name of your God: I am Yahweh. You shall not defraud your neighbor; you shall not steal; and you shall not keep for yourself the wages of a laborer until morning.  You shall not revile the deaf or put a stumbling block before the blind; you shall stand in awe of your God: I am Yahweh.  You shall not render an unjust judgment; you shall not be partial to the poor or defer to the great: with justice you shall judge your neighbor. You shall not go around as a slanderer among your people, and you shall not profit by the blood of your neighbor: I am Yahweh.  You shall not hate in your heart anyone of your kin; you shall reprove your neighbor, or you will incur guilt yourself.  You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against any of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am Yahweh. (Leviticus 19: 1- 18) 

Though reading this at first blush appears legalistic and formal, if you look at what ties these rules together you see an underlying theme.  All these prescriptions argue that we must trust in the abundance and love of God:  I am your God, the God of all being (Yahweh).  I am generous, and you must trust this.  Be holy (or set aside, or sacred) for I am holy.  Let my nature dictate yours.  If you sacrifice an animal and eat it afterwards, participating in a meal with me, you mustn’t be overly stingy and concerned with saving and eating every last bit.  After a day, burn what remains.  Sharing meat about to spoil as a meal with God is an insult.  Let it go.  Revere your parents.  Be grateful for all they’ve done for you, and show your gratitude.    Don’t be part of the industry of producing religious images of gods representing power, wealth, fertility, and pleasure.  Know that I am generous and abundant, and you can’t make a picture of that.  When you harvest, don’t act as if you are desperate in times of shortage: always leave a little for the poor.  Don’t steal, or cheat, or take advantage of others.  Remember that I am abundant and act like you trust in this.  Be decent, fair, and kind in your dealings with others.  Instead of holding resentments in your heart, hating others, give them the dignity and trust of confronting them with problems as they arise.  Don’t take vengeance or hold a grudge.  I am Love.  You too should love.  I am abundance.  Act like you live in abundance, even when you are feeling worry.  Trust me.  Don’t worry.  

People who think that the Old Testament is deficient and the New Testament sufficient, that the Old is bad and the New is good, that the Old Testament’s God is nasty and the New Testament’s God loving and kind, simply have not read either of these texts carefully enough.   There are nasty descriptions of God in the New Testament and descriptions of God as Love in the Old.    The basic idea of God as abundance, love, and kindness lies behind both Testaments, and dictates the moral teaching of both, each in its own ways.  In both, faith means trusting God’s goodness, and showing it in one’s actions toward others.  

Thanks be to God. 

--Tony+



Thursday, April 21, 2016

Faith Seeking Understanding (Mid-week Message)

 


Faith Seeking Understanding
Fr. Tony’s Midweek Message
April 21, 2016

Today is the feast day of St. Anselm of Canterbury, who died on this day in 1109.  He is known today best as the scholastic theologian who gave the definition of theology as “faith seeking understanding” (fides quaerens intellectum), and developed the ontological proof of the existence of God and the satisfaction theory of atonement. 

The ontological proof states that the existence of God is implied in the very idea of God, since God is “the thing than which nothing better can be conceived” and if non-existent, then less than the idea of a God that actually exists.  Many moderns take this as a mere play on words or circular reasoning rather than a serious logical proof.  But the idea is powerful—the idea of God implies its own existence; trusting God (having “faith”) implies by its nature the existence of God, or, indeed, that God is existence or being itself.

Anselm based his understanding of the atonement on his own society’s code of feudal honor: a slight against the honor of a feudal Lord had to be paid by a social equal.  The idea was applied to God:  God as perfect and eternal could only have a perfect and eternal peer pay the price (through punishment) of human sin.  This was, according to Anslem “Why God became man” (Cur Deus homo factus est) and died on the cross.  The idea of transferred punishment, first expressed as such in Anslem, became the basis for the Renaissance and modern doctrine of atonement where transferred punishment is the principal or only thing at work in atonement.   As popular as it later became, the idea is plagued with a basic problem:  Scripture teaches that Jesus saved us from ourselves and our sins, not from God.  Though elements of transferred punishment show up in various passages of scripture, it is never expressed as such in the Bible.  Most modern theologians seek for broader and less problematic understandings of the Cross. 

Whether or not we like his ontological proof or theology of satisfaction of God’s honor, Anselm is still a model for us.  He was a person of great spirituality and intentional prayer.  This is seen in how he begins the Proslogion (“Additional Comment”) where he introduces the ontological argument: 

“Come now, O poor human child, turn a while from business, hide for a little time from restless thoughts, cast away troublesome cares, put aside wearisome distractions. Give yourself a little leisure to converse with God, and rest awhile in Him.    Enter into the secret chamber of your heart: leave everything outside except for God and what may help you seek God.  When you have shut the door, then seek God!  Say now, O my whole heart, say now to God, I seek your face; Your face, Lord, I seek!  Come now then, O Lord my God, teach my heart when and how I may seek you, where and how I may find you? O Lord, if you are not here, where else may I seek you?  If you are everywhere, why do I not see you, since you are here present? Surely indeed you dwell in the light that no one can approach.  But where is that light unapproachable? Or how may I approach it since it is unapproachable? Or who shall lead me and bring me into it that I may see you in it? Again, by what tokens shall I know you, in what form shall I look for you?   … O Lord, I am bent    downwards, I cannot look up: raise me up, that I may lift my eyes to heaven. … I will seek you with longing for you. I will long after you in seeking you, I will find you by loving you,  I will love you in finding you. … I seek not, O Lord, to search out your depth, but I desire in some measure to understand your truth, which my heart trusts and loves. Nor do I seek to understand that I may believe, but I believe that I may understand. For this too I believe, that unless I first believe, I shall not understand.”

Grace and peace,
Fr. Tony+

Sunday, April 17, 2016

My Sheep Hear My Voice (Easter 4C)




My Sheep Hear My Voice (Easter 4C)
Homily delivered at Trinity Parish, Ashland (OR)
Sunday April 17, 2016 8:00 a.m. said, 10:00 a.m. sung Holy Eucharist
The Rev. Fr. Tony Hutchinson, SCP, Ph.D.


God, take away our hearts of stone
 and give us hearts of flesh. Amen.

I remember very vividly the moment when I knew I needed to leave the denomination of my youth and become an Episcopalian.   I had been raised Mormon; both Elena and I came from families with many generations in that faith. When I was about 14, I was about ready to leave faith altogether, but an inspired local leader asked me to teach Sunday School to 7 year olds: a course on Old Testament stories.  The next year, I taught stories about Jesus from the Gospels.  These stories spoke deeply to me, and I had a spiritual experience at the age of 16 that led me to go on a Mormon mission to France and marry in the Mormon Temple.  The truth be told, though, my true passion was always these Bible stories; my interest in purely Mormon scriptures and history was always derivative from this.  That’s why I studied Classics and Hebrew at BYU as an undergraduate and then went to Catholic University in Washington DC for a Ph.D. in Biblical Studies. 

As I learned more, I found traditional LDS ways of understanding scripture and history more problematic.  I saw the continuity within the early church between the apostles and the ante-Nicene fathers, and came to accept the Apostles’ and Nicene Creeds while I was still at BYU.  As my knowledge and intellectual rigor developed and grew under the tutelage of Jesuits, Dominicans, Sulpicians, and Franciscans, my spirituality focused as well.  Eventually, the tensions were just too great: legalism, suspicion of intellectuals, rigid authority, and injustice for women and various minorities.  But I also saw that Roman Catholicism, as it began to draw back from the openness of Vatican II, suffered from many of these same problems. 

I turned to the Episcopal Church.   As for many of you, when I first came to an Episcopal Church, I felt that I had come home.  I recognized what the Gospel of John calls “worship in spirit and in truth.”  Here was a part of Christ’s one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church that tried to follow both to the spirit and the letter of Christ’s words, was honest and reasonable, and sought to be open to the spirit.   For me, Anglicanism had the strengths of both Mormonism and Roman Catholicism without what I saw as the craziness of Utah or what the Prayer Book calls the “enormities of Rome.” 

It took several years.  As one of my Franciscan teachers said, “you do not change religions like you are changing a shirt.”   Sometimes when I was ready to leave, Elena was not; and then when she was ready to leave, I was not.  Years passed.  Life went on, with its challenges, joys, and pains, and the need for spiritual support and grounding.  I tried different spiritual paths to help me even as I remained a practicing Mormon.  But the tensions grew as time went on, and finally, there was little to hold us in the church of our families and our youth. 

One day, I read in Thomas Merton’s book Zen and the Birds of Appetite a passage that said something like this: “Any God that needs to be kept alive through constant effort of mind and acts of will is an idol." The next day, I read in Merton's Meditation and Spiritual Direction, "God does not expect us to be a robot army of victim souls.”  With my heart in turmoil, I attended a Wednesday noon Eucharist at St. Mary’s Foggy Bottom near the State Department.  I heard scriptures preached that day that spoke to my heart and gave me the spiritual sustenance that I had been missing.

When I return to the office at State, I talked to a friend and office mate. Damaris had spent much of her career in Southeast Asia, and was probably best described as a Buddhist.  She always had a great listening ear, and gave support and comfort.  So I expressed my frustration and turmoil.

Damaris rarely gave advice.  She usually just listened and asked questions to help me recognize what I was thinking or feeling.  But here, she broke from her regular pattern.  She stared at me incredulously and said, “Tony, what’s the matter with you?  Are you crazy?  It’s obvious you are a very unhappy Mormon.  Life is short.  Why do you waste your time beating your head against the wall?  Accept the facts.  You can’t go on like this just to please family or friends!  You find joy in the Episcopal Church. If your Mormon family and friends love you, they’ll see that and come to accept it.  If not, don’t worry about them.”   

Within a couple of weeks, Elena and I had joined the choir at our neighborhood Episcopal Parish, and quit the choir at the Mormon Ward.  We have never looked back.    And we were able to retain our deepest relationships.  Later, the priest who brought us into the Episcopal Church officiated when we took Christian vows of marriage for our 30th anniversary.  Our Mormon friends and family came.   

In today’s Gospel, Jesus says, “My sheep hear my voice.”    The phrase echoes lines from earlier in the chapter:   “The shepherd is the one who enters through the gate of the sheepfold.  … The sheep hear his voice. He calls his own sheep by name and leads them out.  … He goes ahead of them, and the sheep follow him because they recognize his voice.  They will not follow a stranger, because they do not recognize his voice.  Rather they flee from him. …  I am the Gate …  I am the Good Shepherd. …” (John 10: 2, 4,  9, 11).

How do we recognize the voice of Jesus?  

Modern theologians like David Tracy, Karl Rahner, or Hans Urs von Balthasar say we come to faith and recognize the voice of God by intuition.  It is not an external process of hearing and merely submitting or accepting.  It is a process that involves our memory, our desires, and hopes, and happens in community.    This is based on a central idea in the theology of St. Thomas Aquinas:  that true knowledge of things or people involves sharing in their nature.  Connaturality is the technical term for this, the word behind the French word for intimate or experiential knowledge, connaître. 

It’s like recognizing a taste, a flavor, or a scent.  It cannot be put into words,:  a flavor might be described as bitter, salty, or sweet, like chocolate, apples, or chicken.  It helps a little, but does not sum up recognition.  A scent might have floral overtones, spiciness, or musk.  But hearing these words does not give you the ability to recognize the smell. 

“My sheep hear my voice.  They truly know it.  They recognize it.” 

Saying that you can tell Jesus’ voice by whether it is in accordance with scripture misses the point.  The fact is, there are many voices in scripture; some of them are not good.  They are included, I think, by way of example, to help us recognize what is not the voice of Jesus. 

But Scripture matters.  Here is where my story comes in.  It was those Bible stories that I taught as a teenager that gave me the start of a faith that was my own.   The Bible was so clearly strange.  It beckoned from afar, and not always in a warm or positive sense at all.  But hearing the parables of Jesus, and the ways the different stories about Jesus were told in the different Gospels helped me have a sense of what Jesus might be like, what his voice might be like, amid all the competing claims.  Simply being intentional about reading the stories, and study, and prayer, and reflection and discussion with others who had faith in Jesus—this helped me get a sense of what Jesus sounds like.   Over the years, it grew to the point where I can say “that’s not Jesus speaking” when a claimed teaching of Jesus does not ring true. Despite all the differences between the various Gospels, reading these stories brings us a coherent voice that is recognizable.  Today when I hear something, even something very hard and challenging for me, that rings true to what I have heard of Jesus’ voice up till now I can say, “that’s him.” 

And in this there is joy.  When we hear Jesus’ voice, he challenges us and we are changed, at least in our perceptions and desires.  And that leads to gradual change in how we act, in who we are.  And this helps us find who we truly are, what God intended when God made each of us. But it all starts with reading the Gospels and prayer.   

After our clergy conference this week, Bishop Michael wrote this: 

[The Rev. Scott A. Gunn, director of the Forward Movement and presenter at our conference,] focused … on getting people to simply read the bible…  He suggested several potential ways to invite Episcopal congregations to take up the challenge of learning the biblical narrative and gave a few examples of ways he had engaged congregations in the past to do this work.  I know that if the clergy and congregational leaders take up this challenge, it will be life giving.  The intentional reading of Holy Scripture for personal growth and the daily practice of prayer are keys to personal and congregational vitality.  I hope you are inspired to consider how you might move closer to God through these practices.

We read a lot of scripture here at Trinity: for some of us it is in Daily Morning and Evening Prayer, for some of us, our Bible study group, for some of us, private devotions.  But we need to do better. In the coming months, we will be looking for ways to better connect all of us to these stories. 

In the name of God, Amen

Wednesday, April 13, 2016

Following Jesus (Midweek Message)




Following Jesus
Fr. Tony’s Midweek Message
April 13, 2016

I am writing this from the Diocesan clergy conference, held at the Oregon Garden in Silverton.  The Rev. Scott A. Gunn, director of the Forward Movement and co-founder of Lent Madness, is the main presenter.  One of the central ideas Scott has been discussing is what it means to be a disciple of Jesus, a person who follows Jesus. 

“Take my yoke upon you and learn from me,” says Jesus (Matthew 11:28-30), “For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.”  The path of following Jesus is not full of super heroic demands and denials: it is gentle and grows organically from where we are.  Jesus loves and has the best interest of everyone he encounters in mind, yet he challenges us all.  To the woman caught in adultery, he says, “Neither do I accuse you” (John 8:11).  But then he adds, “Go, and don’t sin anymore.”  He is asking her to turn from her past, not demanding that she be perfect right here and now.  

When Jesus seems at times to make impossible demands of us (“cut off your hand, or put out your eye, if that’s what you need to do to keep from sin,” Mark 9:43-45; “be perfect as your Father in heaven is perfect,” Matthew 5:48), I think this is more by way of saying just how impossible it is to be right with God on our own.   “But what is impossible for us humans is possible with God” (Luke 18:27).

The point is, we must turn aside, like Moses noticing that burning bush (Exodus 3:3), and be present for God.  We must learn.  We must follow.  We must pray.  We must serve.  We must share—both our stuff and our faith.  And sharing faith means both in words and example. 

Presiding Bishop Michael Curry’s call to us to be followers of Jesus, fervent members of the Jesus Movement underscores this need for us to be disciples.   It means being ever open to change, and being willing to take Jesus and his teachings seriously. 

I think that one of the great reasons that the Church is in such bad odor in our society, both for the religious and the non-religious, is that we have made Jesus into a point of doctrine, and believing in him a point of division between insiders and outsiders.  We have not been disciples, trying always to follow him and to learn from him. 

Yet he invites us to this still.  And his yoke is easy, his burden light. 

Grace and Peace. 

--Fr. Tony+


Thursday, April 7, 2016

Wandering into Wonder



Wandering into Wonder
Fr. Tony’s Midweek Message
April 7, 2016

This morning, a participant in our chanted Morning Prayer said to me after we had finished the service, “Whew! During the General Thanksgiving my mind started wandering.  I suddenly was thinking about whether I would need to take off my sweater later today as the weather warms.  Why do our minds wander so?  What’s that all about?”
All I could say is that my mind often wanders too, and that it is just part of how we seem to be hard-wired: we have an overabundance of attention and occasionally it lets off steam by wandering while waking, like dreams while we are asleep.   

The interesting thing here is that many spiritual disciplines and mystic traditions find in the wandering mind a possible access point to the unseen.   Many meditative practices include instructions for what to do when your mind wanders as you are doing a spiritual exercise, whether repeating a mantra, a name of God, or a short prayer, or focusing on a visual point like a candle or flower, or repeating a question.  At that point, the spiritual directors say, recollect your thought, note what distracted you as a possible hint to what is going on inside, put this aside, and then, without beating up on yourself, get back on task. 

Some practices aim at harnessing the overabundance of attention that produces mental wandering.   In praying with bead chaplets, we have usually specific instructions to occupy our minds with one thing while our lips say and our bodies do another.  In the Anglican Prayer Chaplet, we say the Jesus Prayer (“Lord Jesus, Son of God, have mercy on me a sinner.”) on each bead as we direct our thoughts to specific prayer intentions (usually, people we are praying for).  In the Marian Rosary, we say the “Our Father” and the “Hail Mary” for each group of beads or bead while picturing in our mind one of the “Mysteries” of the faith, whether Joyful, Luminous, Sorrowful, or Glorious.  Orthodox knotted prayer rope devotions follow the same plan:  pray one thing while picturing in your mind something else.  The idea in all of these practices is to create a space in the mind and in the heart that is blank and open.  And into that space we hope that the Spirit flows.

Those who criticize the use of fixed prayers or repeated prayers as “meaningless repetition” or “mindless robotic practice” miss this point.  We say repeated prayers not mistakenly hoping “like the pagans” that somehow “by the repetition of it, God might finally hear” (Matt 6:7).  Rather, we seek to open up our own hearts so that we might better hear God.  That’s why most of these practices also include reflection on scriptural passages or scenes.  Like walking the Labyrinth, such devotions seek to relax us so that our wanderings of mind may open us to actual wonder.

Grace and Peace, 
Fr. Tony+  

Sunday, April 3, 2016

A Believing Heart (Easter 2C)

 


The Doubt of St. Thomas, He Qi,  2001


A Believing Heart (Easter 2C)
Homily delivered at Trinity Parish, Ashland (OR)
Sunday April 2, 2016 8:00 a.m. said, 10:00 a.m. sung Holy Eucharist
The Rev. Fr. Tony Hutchinson, SCP, Ph.D.


God, take away our hearts of stone
 and give us hearts of flesh. Amen.

Moments of hopeless despair come occasionally.  One for me occurred in Lewes Delaware in the early 80s:  Elena and I had taken our still growing family of two children to the beach.  After a long, relaxed day, the sun was about to set in the west. No one was left on the beach but us.  Elena was sheltering from cool evening wind under a blanket; I was reading.  We each thought the other was watching the children, playing in the sand beside us. Elena suddenly said with terror in her voice, “Where’s Lonnie?”  We looked up and down the beach as far as we could see.   Our four year old was nowhere to be seen.  Panicking, I began to run along the beach in the direction we had last seen him, trying to spot him on the beach in the lowering mists and scanning the water: that vast Atlantic Ocean only feet from us, its rising treacherous surf just high enough to sweep our little boy off of his feet.  The last people we had seen on the beach, maybe 15 minutes before, looked sketchy at best.  Now, in our imaginations, they seemed like monstrous threats to children.   The approaching twilight focused our fear into one spot of sharp despair.  Holding hands, Elena and I prayed against hope, “God please help us find Lonnie.  Please keep him safe.”   Then Elena said, “It’s a distance to the changing room, but maybe he went to the bathroom without telling anyone. You know how private he is.”  So I ran back toward the barrier dunes. Just as I got to the boardwalk, there was Lonnie, walking calming and quietly back from the rest room.    I hugged him hard. He seemed puzzled at all the sudden attention from Mom and Dad.
Elena and I were very thankful.  Lonnie was safe as we had prayed.  Thinking about it afterward, we wondered, had God answered our prayer?   Or had we just misunderstood things and gotten very frightened needlessly?  No one had bothered Lonnie in the restroom, and he had not lost his way.  And he most certainly had not drowned.  From his point of view, nothing remarkable had happened at all.  From ours, we were very thankful. 

It’s like that a lot with answers to prayers and miracles in our lives:  though from inside they seem to be overwhelming evidence of God’s care and love, perhaps even providence or intervention, from the outside they can be explained as misunderstandings, the resolution of groundless fears, the normal working of nature, or, perhaps mere coincidence. 

When I was a boy, I was taught that God heard and answered prayers, and that miracles just like those in the Bible could happen to us, if we were righteous enough.   But then I grew up.  I gained experience.  I realized that perhaps God is not so involved in my life, and that what I used to think was an answered prayer was just coincidence.   We live in an age of science and of sophistication.  Growing up means absorbing that. 

There were further questions.  We had friends in college whose little baby was afflicted by a horrible congenital disease. Despite all the all the efforts of medical science, despite prayers, anointings, and blessings, the little boy suffered and died slowly.   It is not the only time in my life when I wished that the world were the way I had been taught in Sunday School.  Why does God answer some prayers and not others, especially those most desperate and most right?  A partisan God, or worse, a capricious one, is not at all attractive.    

I admit: Doubt is a good thing, something that helps keep us safe from hucksters and conmen, and from misunderstanding the varied and puzzling sense perceptions that pour in.   God placed it in our hearts, and made it a part of growing up, to help keep us safe.  It is part of our survival instinct. 

But we are diminished if we let doubt rob us of our sense of gratitude and wonder.   We may not be as naïve as we once were, but it is clear that we have lost something in the process.   A subtle, niggling voice in the back of my head now is almost always there, ready to chime in at moments of joy and thankfulness and say, “An answered prayer?  A miracle? Maybe not so much.”  It discourages me from praying, or at least actually asking God for what I desire in my heart.  I am afraid of having my heart broken:  asking what I desire deeply, something good and right, and then getting that hope slapped down.  

I admit this by way of confession:  whatever change has happened in my heart, it is not entirely good.  I can confess it publicly today without much embarrassment because I think that most of us have suffered a similar loss as we became adults.  It’s just the way things are with most of us. 

In today’s Gospel, it is clear that Thomas has suffered such a loss of innocence:  “I won’t believe Jesus has come back from the dead unless I see it with my own eyes!”  It’s really unfair to sum up this story and the whole of St. Thomas’ life by saying that he, Doubting Thomas, was alone in this among the disciples.  All the other disciples—bar none—at various times in these stories doubted reports of Jesus’ resurrection.

So in today’s story, Jesus tells all of us, along with Thomas,  “do not doubt, but believe.”  The Greek text is clearer than our translation here:  do not be apistos, but be pistos—do not be unfaithful but faithful, do not be unbelieving but believing.  Pistos has a broad meaning.  I would translate this as “trusting” as well as “trustworthy.” 

Be believing.  Be faithful.  Be trusting.  There are so many scriptures that play on this theme!  Jesus ends most of his parables with “let the one who has ears, hear!”  Without a disposition of the heart, we are deaf to the voice that matters. 

Paul says, “We walk by faith, not by sight” (2 Cor 5:7).  And because of this faith, he says, we are not afraid, either to live or to die.  Trust and love have replaced fear. 

Jesus in John’s Gospel says it is how we react to his words, in a trusting or a rejecting manner, that reveals who and what we are: “I came not to judge, but to save.  It is my word that has already created a judgment of sorts—how you react to it tells who you are”  (John 12).  

I suspect that most of the stories of miracles and deeds of wonder in scripture tell things in such a way that this implicit judgment is evident in the telling of the story:  how could the Egyptians, the backsliding Israelites, or the Pharisees not be wicked when they persist in fighting God and Jesus in the face of such clear evidence as the miracles as narrated?

I am inclined to think that events in real human lives lying behind such stories probably were a bit more ambiguous.   For whatever reason, God seems to have made the world in such a way that we are never forced by evidence to believe in him.   God wants willing trust, not coerced obedience.   I suspect this is because forced trust is not really trust; compelled love, not really love.    To be sure, moments occur that seem overwhelmingly convincing.  But usually this is at the end of a series of small steps in the ambiguous dark.  We draw close to God in faith by little steps, and God responds once in a great while with a giant step toward us.  But then the moment is gone, and we are left with our memory.  And memory itself is very ambiguous.  Faith often is consists in persisting in our trust and love from those high moments even in the dark, dry periods that follow, again, a few small steps forward, with God making a giant leap toward us after. 

Having a believing heart is at the core of being a happy and balanced person.  It is at the heart of being a Christian.  Having a trusting heart is at the core of being trustworthy: honesty breeds honesty.  A believing heart wisely lets the niggling voice raise doubts, but does not let it rob us of our thanks, trust, and hope.  A believing heart persists in openness to the strange, the unprecedented, and the as yet unseen.  It does not belittle the faith of others, even when this may seem strange or silly.  A believing heart continues to pray, and to act and serve as if all the good stories are true, even when doubt comes.  A believing heart is a great bulwark against fear.  It senses intuitively that there is no problem so big, no disaster too awful, no corner so dark that God cannot help us through it and turn things better.  While a believing heart is not belief in magical control of things to suit ourselves, it cultivates and honors a sense of wonder and magic at the heart of everything.  It recognizes the love that is beneath and behind all things. 

Trusting God through the dark, expressing thanks through the ambiguity, praying and asking for help despite our niggling voice, and trying to be honest with God and ourselves through all of this leads us through the doubt and finally brings us to that light where there is no room for anything but thanks, just like for Thomas in today’s reading. 

Leonard Cohen, in the little-sung final verse of his great anthem “Hallelujah” says it this way: 

I did my best, it wasn't much
I couldn't feel, so I tried to touch
I've told the truth, I didn't come to fool you
And even though
It all went wrong
I'll stand before the Lord of Song
With nothing on my tongue but Hallelujah. 

In the name of God, Amen

Saturday, April 2, 2016

Living the Resurrection (Trinitarian article)

 

Fr. Tony’s Letter to the Trinitarians
April 2016
Living the Resurrection

The Great 50 days of Easter this year last from March 27 to May 15, commemorating the 40 day ministry of the risen Lord, his Ascension, and the 10 additional days until the coming of the Spirit at Pentecost.   But every Sunday of the year is a feast of the Resurrection, reminding us that we should live in light of the Resurrection all year round.  Here are some suggestions of how to live into the resurrection based on details in the stories of Jesus’ appearances after his death. 

Touch the risen Lord. “Look at my hands and my feet; see that it is I myself. Touch me and see; for a ghost does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have” (Luke 24:39).   In the story these words underscore the concrete reality of the Risen Lord.  In our lives, we have many ways of making Jesus less concrete, less real:  taming him and making sure he never says anything that challenges us or makes us question our lives and assumptions, thinking of him purely as “meek and mild,” concerned only with spiritual or interior truth, and a place in a heaven by and by after this life.  To live the resurrection, we must keep focused on the crazy Jesus of the Gospel narratives, the one who demands social justice here and now, and advises radical hospitality and welcome here and now, especially when it makes us the most uncomfortable.  We must listen to him as he calls us to challenging and unexpected things.  

Cast away fear.  “Do not be afraid; I know that you are looking for Jesus who was crucified.  He is not here; for he has been raised, as he said” (Matthew 28:5-6).  We often say with our lips “I believe that Christ is raised from the dead” at the same time that we cultivate the habits of fear and caution in our hearts.  Forgetting the profligate, overwhelming love of God that Jesus taught and that was proven in the resurrection, we often act as functional atheists:  we make decisions and take courses of action as if death is the end of us, as if there were no loving God at all.  At the least, we should remember from “The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel,” that “in the end, all things will be well” and know that if all things are not well, then it is not yet the end.  We should feel in our hearts, with St. Julian of Norwich that “all things shall be well, all will be well, and all manner of things shall be well.”  At the most, we should hear Jesus in the Beatitudes and know that with God, there is blessing and happiness even in life circumstances seen as misfortunes (“blessed are the poor, the hungry, those who mourn.”) 

Cast away worry.  “Why do you seek the living among the dead?” (Luke 24:5).   Realizing that all will be well relieves us of the need to worry about our lives.  This is what Jesus taught on the Mount:   “Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing?  Look at the birds of the air; they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they?   … Therefore do not worry, saying, ‘What will we eat?’ or ‘What will we drink?’ or ‘What will we wear?’” (Matt 6:25-31).

Know that God deeply loves you and others.  When the angels and Jesus say again and again “do not fear” and “do not worry,” this is based on a firm experience of God as loving and benevolent, not just to a few, but to all.   Love casts out fear. 

Be bold and share your experience and faith with others.   Again and again in the stories, the disciples are told “go and tell the others what you have seen and heard.”   Sharing the faith helps us formulate it better in our minds and hearts.  Simply telling others what our experience has been is enough:  that’s what the word witness means. 

Prodigally share with others and let others share with you.  “When [the disciples] had gone ashore, they saw a charcoal fire there, with fish on it, and bread.   [The Risen] Jesus said to them, ‘Bring some of the fish that you have just caught”  (John 21:9-10).   One of the signs of faith and confidence in the risen Lord is a lack of stinginess, of concern for preserving one’s scarce resources.    “God gives the blessings of rain and sunshine both on the righteous and wicked alike,” taught Jesus, “… be complete in this, as God is complete” (Matthew 5:45, 48).   Service, almsgiving, contributing to worthy causes, and giving service, offerings, and tithes to build the Church without fear of scarcity are all signs of a resurrection faith.   So is the ability to graciously accept gifts from others. 

Admitting our dependence on God, turning things over to God, giving up care and worry, and sharing in community our possessions, energies, and our experiences are all signs of a life rooted in the Resurrection of Jesus. 

Easter may be 50 days, be we should live as though it’s 365. 

Grace and Peace,
Fr. Tony+