Wednesday, July 30, 2014

The Yes of Jesus (Mid-week Message)


Mystic Christ, Fr. John Giuliani 
Fr. Tony’s Mid-week Message
July 30, 2014
The Yes of Jesus

Are you now going to accuse me of being flip with my promises because [my plans to visit you] didn’t work out? Do you think I talk out of both sides of my mouth—a glib yes one moment, a glib no the next? Well, you’re wrong. I try to be as true to my word as God is to his. Our word to you wasn’t a careless yes canceled by an indifferent no. How could it be? When Silas and Timothy and I proclaimed the Son of God among you, did you pick up on any yes-and-no, on-again, off-again waffling? Wasn’t it a clean, strong Yes?   Whatever God has promised gets stamped with the Yes of Jesus. In him, this is what we preach and pray, the great Amen, God’s Yes and our Yes together, gloriously evident. God affirms us, making us a sure thing in Christ, putting his Yes within us. By his Spirit he has stamped us with his eternal pledge—a sure beginning of what he is destined to complete.” (2 Corinthians 1:17-22, The Message)

Paul here replies to the Corinthians’ thinking he has been wishy-washy by telling a great truth of the Gospel:  the Good News of God in Christ is all about affirmation, all about YES, and not about doubting or saying NO.  

We tend to define things by saying no:  we don’t like this, we can’t have that, we disapprove of such and such.    Most of our alienation from ourselves, from God, and from others results from our saying NO to various things, different ideas, and people.  We end up divided, separated, and isolated.  Our “no’s” come from scarcity, fear, and uncertainty. Paul says that at heart, the Gospel is positive, not negative.  It is affirmation, acceptance, and welcoming. 

Finding ourselves and being reconciled to each other and to God entails saying YES instead of NO. 

Obviously, saying YES in some ways involves an implied NO to other things.   (“Yes” to fidelity in marriage means “no” to wandering affections; “Yes” to loving others as oneself means “no” to abusing them.)  But Paul’s point is that in Christ, we focus on affirming the Good rather than on denying or negating the bad.   It is a matter of spirit-driven love and inclusion rather than legalistic rule keeping and exclusion. 

I think his point is well taken.  When we focus on the positive, and put our emotional efforts into affirmation, we find energy and power.  When we focus on the negative, and put our emotional efforts into negation, we become great energy sinks, wearing ourselves out as well as those about us. 

Grace and Peace.

--Fr. Tony+

Sunday, July 27, 2014

God Here and Now (Proper 12A)


 
God Here and Now
27 July 2014
Proper 12A
Spoken Eucharist 8:00 a.m.; Sung Eucharist with Holy Baptism 10:00 a.m.
Parish Church of Trinity Ashland (Oregon)
Genesis 29:15-28; Psalm 105:1-11, 45b or Psalm 128; Romans 8:26-39;
Matt 13:31-33, 42-52

God, take away our hearts of stone, and give us hearts of flesh. Amen

What would the world look like if everything were as it ought to be?  What would it be like if God were truly in charge, right here, right now, of everything?  This is a question that Jesus regularly asked himself, and which became the core of his teaching. 

He tells parables to try to get at the matter.  We heard several today: the Mustard Plant, the Yeast, the Hidden Treasure, the Costly Pearl, and the Dragnet.    We are reading them in the Gospel of Matthew, which regularly uses the discreet euphemism “kingdom of heaven” for what everyone else in the New Testament knows as “the Kingdom of God.”  The idea is God’s kingship, or reign, how the world would be if it were as it ought to be.   

What would it be like if God were truly in charge, right here, right now?  The people around Jesus gave various answers: Supporters of Rome and the Temple Establishment said things were as they ought to be, with the Empire in charge and Judean society ordered with them on top.   The Essenes argued that the world would not be set to right until their kooky little sect had conquered the world by force of arms in apocalyptic struggle.  The Zealots thought it would come when their violent revolt against the Roman occupiers succeeded.   The Pharisees taught that it lay not in society, but in personal piety, scripture study and prayer, and putting a fence around the law so as to separate Jews from gentiles more and more.

What would it be like if God were truly in charge, right here, right now?  Jesus’ parables give a different answer.  They grab you and throw you for a loop—demand a change of perspectives and expectations.




God coming here and now, fully in charge—It’s like a mustard plant:  a tiny seed that produces a huge plant, mainly a weed and not a cultivated crop, growing in unusual places, unplanned, apart from human control.   It does not measure up to the usual images for God’s kingdom—vineyards, olive trees, or the great cedar tree, which in Ezekiel shelters the wild birds in its branches.  For Jesus, the mustard weed shelters the birds.   



God coming here and now, fully in charge—is like a woman who stirs in a couple of tablespoons of yeast into three measures—about fifty pounds—of flour.   With a little time, that huge amount of dough is raised.  God in charge is not the pure, unleavened bread kosher for Passover, but the bread of ordinary life, with its impure but overwhelming leavening.   God in charge is not the holy work of male priests, but the ordinary domestic work of women! 



God coming here and now, fully in charge—is like a peasant working someone else’s field who uncovers a treasure hidden there. Excited, he reburies it, and then scrapes together everything he has so he can purchase the field and its contents.  The field worker, not the land-owner, finds the treasure: usually only those getting their hands dirty in work are the ones who actually know its details and run into its surprises.    The morality here is not that of legal titles and deeds, but finders, keepers.  No matter how hard it is for the poor peasant to scrape together the necessary capital to buy the field, he will do it once he has had a glimpse of the treasure, since it is so wonderful. 




God coming here and now, fully in charge—is like a drag-net that catches all sorts of fish.  It is not selective or discriminating.  It works below the surface, hidden, and catches everything it touches.  The net is inclusive.   St. Matthew, ever on the lookout for ways to regularize some of Jesus’ more “anti-religious” statements, has added the comment about sorting good and bad fish on the shore.  But Jesus’ original point was that God in charge is overwhelmingly inclusive, and uncontrollable.

God coming here and now, fully in charge—is like a jewel merchant who runs into the absolutely most perfect pearl he has ever seen.  Like the peasant, he sells everything he has in order to purchase the prize.   That net, as we just saw, catches all sorts of fish.  Not only dispossessed field hands can find a treasure.  Those accustomed to trading fine things can as well.  Maybe even the religious, maybe even the pious and observant--those who are often the butt of the jokes found in Jesus’ parables—may yet encounter God, and be permanently changed.   But the cost for them is just as high as for the dispossessed.  The final remark in this reading—“a scribe trained for the kingdom of heaven is like a householder who lovingly shows his guests his treasures—old and new”—is Matthew’s gentle way of saying this.  Even scribes like him, with their concern for keeping unchanged what is valuable from the past, can be totally changed by this coming of God, here and now, fully in charge. 

Most of these ways of describing God in charge contain a shock element: unclean leaven, a dishonest means of gaining a treasure, a fish harvesting method that makes no distinction between clean and unclean, a weed that takes the place of the noble Cedar of Lebanon.   But they all include pure, unmixed joy at overwhelming, almost grotesque abundance, and a desire to sacrifice all to have to share that abundance. 

We have heard these parables so often, we don’t actually listen to them.  Besides, they use images that come from common life experiences in Jesus’ Palestine, but not so common in our modern lives. 

So here are some parables I have written to make the same shocking points Jesus intends in his.

God coming here and now, fully in charge is like a woman who buys a dollar lottery ticket.  Not expecting to win, she doesn’t even check the results for a few days.  But when she does, she learns she has not only won, but won big: 10 million dollars.   She is so shocked she falls down and can’t talk for a few minutes. 

God coming here and now, fully in charge is like a man who gets a bad tattoo.  After several years of being dissatisfied, ashamed, and unhappy every time he sees it, he goes into a tattoo parlor and asks if they can fix old, bad tattoos.  One of the artists is an expert in repair and redesign, but it costs a lot. The man gets excited, and goes and refinances his house to get the money together.  After many hours of pain in the chair, the man looks at the magic the artist has wrought, using the old defective ink-work as ground for and part of a larger piece.  The result is beautiful, much better than even what the man had originally imagined when he got the first tattoo.  He is so happy with it that he constantly tries to find occasions where wear short sleeves so he can show it off.

God coming here and now, fully in charge is like the Boston Red Sox in 2004.  From 1918 on, the curse of the Bambino meant that the Sox could not win any title game.  Then one night, the Red Sox came back from a 0-3 best-of-seven deficit to beat the Yankees in the League Championship and then went on to sweep the St. Louis Cardinals in the the World Series.  The joy in the streets of Boston that night is like God coming in full power here and now. 

God coming here and now, fully in charge is like a woman in the process of a nasty divorce.  Her abusive husband has hired the better lawyer, and she is about to lose almost everything.  But in sorting through things that the husband couldn’t be bothered to look at, she finds the old coin collection he inherited from his father a few years after their marriage and which he has never bothered to even look at.  She notices a couple of coins that look rare and checks up on them.  They are worth more than all their other assets combined.  So she says nothing, puts the coin collection on her ledger in the agreement, which the ex-husband signs happily.  She never has to worry about finances, or he abusive ex, again.

Jesus’ parables of the Kingdom emphasize the presence of God in everyday life—glorious messy everyday life.  They stress the utter strangeness of God in what we are used to.  In these stories, we encounter abundance, joy, the fulfillment of human desire and the turning of tables on the oppressor.

God come fully in charge—here and now: abundance, surprise, and a call to joyfully give up what alienates us from God and from each other. 

I invite us all this week in our prayer and meditation to ask how we think things would be if God were truly in charge and things were as they ought to be.  Picture it, savor it.  Listen to Jesus’ parables of the kingdom, and let us use our imaginations to try to come with some of our own.  And may we pray for the joyful abandon that we might turn away from these things in our hearts and lives that keep this vision from being realized.   May we pray and live, “your kingdom, your will be done, on earth as in heaven” and know the abundant joy of God coming here and now, fully in charge.   May we live the happy news that Jesus proclaimed. 

In the name of God, Amen

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Despising the World and the Vanity of Affections (Mid-week)

 

Fr. Tony’s Mid-week Message
“Despising the World” and the “Vanity of Affections”
July 24, 2014

In the Holy Women, Holy Men cycle of commemoration today is the feast day of Thomas à Kempis.  He was a priest and monk in the Order of the Brethren of the Common Life.  He wrote or compiled the great classic of late medieval spirituality, The Imitation of Christ, the second most widely translated and published book after the Bible.

The Imitation is somewhat less popular as a devotional classic today than it was a generation ago.  Much of this stems from its apparent pessimism:  cultivate penitence, love Christ and no one else, despise the world and its vanities (including works of devotion and charity done to please the ego). 

But what we often miss as moderns looking at the Imitation is this:  its pessimism is a jaded reaction to all the systems of devotion, courtesies, and disciplines of the late Medieval Church and Monastery.  Following the “New Devotion” (devotio moderna) of the Brethren of the Common Life, the Imitation is a foretaste of the Renaissance Humanism of Erasmus of Rotterdam and the focus on grace and surrender of the Protestant Reformation.    When Kempis says “love Jesus, and no one else,” he means love Jesus above all, because whatever love you put before Jesus will be taken from you.  Again and again in the Imitation, you hear hints of the joys and loves in everyday life that will be consecrated and enriched if our love of Jesus comes first.   For Kempis, “despising the world” was a dramatic way of saying “get your priorities straight.”  “The world” here means that which separates us from God, not the creation of God around us that God declared “Good, very good!” (Gen. 1:31). 

The beginning of book three of the Imitation expresses the idea clearly, all the while keeping the “despise the world” language: 

“Blessed is the soul who hears the Lord speaking within her, who receives the word of consolation from [God’s] lips. Blessed are the ears that catch the accents of divine whispering, and pay no heed to the murmurings of this world. Blessed indeed are the ears that listen, not to the voice which sounds without, but to the truth which teaches within. Blessed are the eyes which are closed to exterior things and are fixed upon those which are interior. Blessed are they who penetrate inwardly, who try daily to prepare themselves more and more to understand mystery. Blessed are they who long to give their time to God, and who cut themselves off from the hindrances of the world.”

Grace and Peace,

Fr. Tony+

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Do-nothing Jesus (Proper 11A)



Do-Nothing Jesus
Proper 11 Year A
20 July 2014 8 a.m. Said and 10:00 a.m. Sung Mass
Parish Church of Trinity Ashland (Oregon)

God, take away our hearts of stone, and give us hearts of flesh.  Amen

My garden is a bit overgrown this year.  Last year it looked much better, when I weeded and deadheaded regularly.  But I have actually put more time into it this year.  The previous owners had put in a mixed planting scheme, with many beautiful perennial ornamentals mixed with annual vegetables.  I realized late last year that I had weeded out many of my prized plants early in the season because I did not recognize them in their young form.  So this year, I have intentionally let plants grow if I did not immediately recognize them as weeds.  This strategic inaction has been very helpful—I now know to recognize which plants to weed and to let grow next year.  And despite its not looking so great, this year’s  garden is actually much healthier than last year’s. 

To weed, you have to know what plant is good and what plant is bad.  It is a learned skill, as any of you who have tried to keep helpful toddlers from pulling up tomato seedlings have seen.   And sometimes a good plant elsewhere is considered a weed in another setting.  I love blackberries, but cannot have them crowding out everything else in my garden.   Good elsewhere, they’re a weed here.  To know to weed, you have to have a good sense of the overall plan for the garden, and accurate knowledge of the plants in all their stages of development.   

 
Today’s Gospel, the parable of the wheat and the weeds, tells us not to weed.   Jesus is arguing for strategic inaction, not laziness or laxness.  He chooses a particularly deadly weed, sown maliciously by a nasty business competitor, to make his point.  The Greek word for the weed is zizania, bearded darnel, almost indistinguishable from wheat plants.  It produces very little grain, usually infected with ergot fungus, the source of LSD-like hallucinations, convulsions, and death. 

And still Jesus says, “Don’t weed, it’ll ruin the good plants too. Let them grow together.”  The farmer says wait until harvest time, when the good and poisonous plants can be distinguished:  strategic inaction, intentionally doing nothing to accomplish something.    Taoism expresses the idea in the phrase, 無為而治 wu-wei er zhi  “By doing nothing, accomplish everything.” 

It’s always important to ask “what question is this scripture trying to answer?”  The Gospel of Matthew clearly is thinking about the church.  There have always been two conflicting views:  it is exclusive or inclusive?  Is it a gathering of righteous people, screening out bad influences so the righteous can become even better, or is it a kind of hospital ward where all and sundry—the wicked, the mean, the lustful, the morally weak, the heretical, the bizarre—come together to be healed?  If any of this parable goes back to the historical Jesus, it probably is about a larger question, one that theologian Walter Wink said was the biggest of all theological questions:  how do we react to evil?  

The tale ends with a promise that the weeds will be gathered together and burned.  This may lead us to think, “We may not be able to weed as we’d like now, but in the end GOD AND THE ANGELS WILL PULL THE WEEDS AND BURN THEM UP.”   This is about as small-minded as St. Paul saying that we should do kindness to our enemies because by so doing “we heap burning coals on their head” (Rom. 12:20). It misses the point of the story, which is the joy of the harvest after the strategic inaction.    
In this, as in so many other parables, Jesus is taking apart our preconceptions, reworking our definitions, deconstructing our world-view.   The weeds here are noxious, but indistinguishable from the good wheat. Our rules for identifying weeds and wheat may be flawed.  We run too much risk of confusing them. 

That is how it is, isn’t it?  We know who fits in and who doesn’t.  We set up boundaries for our little gardens.  We set up categories and demarcations that label some as unwelcomed weeds.   In our community, we are afraid of those we call “transients.” In our state, at one point we had a law against free people of color residing here.  In our nation, we have borders, and try, with varying degrees of success, to keep outsiders out.  In church, we divide people into categories: saints or sinners, orthodox or heretics, conservatives or liberals. We Episcopalians have a besetting sin of snootiness, so while we may not talk about saints and sinners, we label those with good taste or bad, contributors or ‘the needy,’ those who value ‘traditional and beautiful worship’ or those who ‘prefer the latest fad.’

We are tribal creatures, always wanting labels and markers:  Outsiders or insiders.  Israeli or Palestinian.  Ukrainian or Russian.  Citizens or illegals.  Saints or sinners.  Wheat or Weeds. 

But Jesus says:  your definitions are flawed.  Your boundaries are wrong.  You don’t know the garden’s plan well enough, or the plants well enough.  Let it be.  Let them grow together.  Don’t try to sort this out, let God sort it out. 

So is Jesus a slacker?  A guy who won’t weed his garden or maybe doesn’t believe in weeds?  A “do-nothing” Jesus?  I don’t think so.  Strategic inaction is just that:  strategic. 

He calls us to live in peace, non-judgment, and mutual support.  That does not mean he calls us to not confront and work against evil.  No.  He wants us to fight evil with good, not with evil.  Meet hatred with love.  He sees tribal divisions, factions, dividing God’s creatures into “us and them,” and violence, as evil.   

Implied here is the idea that the division between good and evil is not between different groups of people:  it is not between economic classes, political parties, national armies, people of different nationality or citizenship, different religions.  The line between good and evil runs down the middle of each and every human heart.  Each of our hearts is a field planted with wheat and weeds both.  We do not know enough—either about each other or about God’s plans—to judge the case.  

Look at Jesus’ example.  He didn’t weed out Judas. He never rejected him, but loved him to the end.  He also refused to weed out Peter, as conflicted, impetuous, and changeable as he was.  He counseled against violent resistance of the Roman Imperium and its religious establishment toadies in Judea, yet remained so constantly engaged with it, good and evil alike, and was so effective challenging oppression and injustice that in the end the Roman authorities finally felt they had to kill him as a political rebel.     
When we see evil or malice in front of us, we go into fight or flight mode. But Jesus’ advice is peaceful engagement, strategic inaction.  Jesus teaches us, “Love your enemies. Pray for those who persecute you.” Wish well for those who spitefully use you (Matt. 5:44). Let God decide.  Be a light, not a judge.

We tend to want to avoid the ultimate questions by looking at side issues. We don’t look at the weeds in our own hearts, but want to call other people weeds.  We prefer to be judges—partisans of tribalism, sectarianism, and faction--instead of recognizing in our own hearts and habits what keeps us from being lights.

God knows it is all too easy to point fingers at weeds out there needing to be plucked up and burnt rather than looking at our own heart.   It is hard not to want to fight fire with fire or pray that God fight fire with fire, or just totally give up on someone and withdraw when one of our buttons gets pushed. 

We all have our buttons that people can push that really set us off, that make us want to go running and demand that that weed be plucked and thrust into the fire.  But even the most sterling “righteous” anger in most of us is mixed with self-interest and fear. Think about it carefully. In this messed up world, why is it that only some things cause us to lose our serenity and calm?

A few years ago in Beijing, I became outraged when I saw an Embassy colleague behaving with abusive pettiness toward a subordinate.  I was angry, flummoxed and undone. I wanted bureaucratic vengeance, to beat the person into submission so he would learn to play well with others. I wanted to humiliate and make an example of him.  My reaction was way over the top: a warning signal that something deeper was at work.  My feelings did not tell me so much about the other guy, but about me. 

My spiritual directors have taught me over the years to identify things that throw me off as opportunities to learn about what is going on in my heart. I had a long talk with a close friend. My friend confessed that where I had a “hurtful behavior” button, he had a “that’s not fair” button. Instead of asking what was wrong with the petty colleague, I asked what was it about me that I so totally lost my composure about this?   At root it was fear of losing my own high opinion of myself: I suspected that it was my own tardiness in some of the related work that had placed my subordinate at risk of attack from the badly behaving colleague. It was easier to rage at him than to admit my own guilt in the affair.

I invite us all this week to identify or review our “buttons,” what really makes us lose it, what really makes us blame and demonize others, and reflect on what it is about us not about them that causes this.  There is little we can do about weeding their hearts, but plenty we can do about ours. 

God loves us, each and every one.  So we must learn to love each other. Not pretend to love each other.  Not fight fire with fire, or practice passive aggression as we continue to despise and judge.  But love.  Despite faction, tribe, party, or sect, we must learn to focus on the weeds in our own heart, and not label others as weeds.   We must learn to love as God loves, which almost always means challenging the beloved and being patient, very patient. 

In the name of God, Amen. 




 

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

The least of These (Mid-week)



Fr. Tony’s Mid-week Message
July 15, 2014
“The Least of These”

The Gospel reading for the Daily Office today is the scene of judgment from the Gospel of Matthew (25: 31-46) where the “goats” and the “sheep” are divided on the basis of whether they helped “the least powerful of these, my family.”   It will also be the Gospel reading for the Celtic Eucharist this Sunday evening, in honor of St. Declan, whose family and Christian tribe saved the young St. Patrick from death as he fled from slavery by providing him refuge and a safe haven. 

In the Holy Women, Holy Men cycle of commemoration, today remembers Raoul Wallenberg and the “Righteous Gentiles” who at great personal sacrifice and risk helped to save Jews from destruction during the Nazi holocaust.  The theme of caring for “the least of these” is definitely the theme for today. 

Marcus Borg writes:

“In Jesus’ compassion for the marginalized, for ‘the least of these,’ we see God’s compassionate character.  God wills the well-being of us all, indeed, or all creation.  In Jesus’ passion for the kingdom of God, we see God’s passion for a transformed world—a world of justice and nonviolence in which no one needs to be afraid (see Mic. 4:1-4).  God’s character and passion as we see them in Jesus also have a confrontational dimension: the indictment of what gets in the way of well-being of all of us, and of all that is.”  (Speaking Christian, pp. 93- 94). 

When all is said and done, it will not be our religiosity, our faith, prayer life, cultivated serenity and focus, or our correct opinions that will matter in God’s eyes.  What will matter is whether we cared for each other, and especially, whether we cared for those who needed it the most. 

Grace and peace,  Fr. Tony+   

Sunday, July 13, 2014

Luck of the Draw? (Proper 10A)


Parable of the Sower on Rocky Ground, Stained Glass 13th century, Canterbury Cathedral

Luck of the Draw?
Proper 10 Year A
13 July 2014 8 a.m. Said and 10:00 a.m. Sung Mass
Parish Church of Trinity Ashland (Oregon)

God, take away our hearts of stone, and give us hearts of flesh.  Amen

Cultures are odd.  Though individual people remain individuals, and everyone has their own way of doing and seeing things, in larger groups, we tend to fall into patterns of values, habits, and norms.  We call this culture, a word that simply means what you are planted and grow up with.  We think sometimes that culture is something firm and written in stone, though in fact it is an amorphous group of generalizations that often apply but often do not.

I lived and worked in China for a long time, and gradually absorbed several views and habits of people there. China’s population density means you become accustomed to crowds.  To this day, I feel unease when I’m in a restaurant that is too quiet, with too few customers:  what is wrong with the food here? Chinese people in general have a narrower sense of personal space than Americans: less than a foot, where Americans like usually more than two feet.   So I tend to crowd in on people sometimes.  If you get into an elevator in China already with one passenger, you tend to sidle up right alongside them.  Otherwise, the empty space might get both of you.  Do that in America, and people will think you’re threatening.   Americans like a wide berth, but direct eye contact.  Chinese prefer closer physical presence and averted eyes.  But no touching.  For them, staring at someone in the eyes is the ultimate creepy act.   But here, if you avert your eyes too much, people wonder what mischief or plots you’re up to, or why you think you’re so special.  I am gradually learning to recalibrate on these things. I have to laugh at the incongruity of a fair-skinned, blue-eyed North American like me having to relearn the ways home and eschew Sinified manners. 

 
In one respect, I have always remained very, very un-Chinese:  I do not believe in such a thing as luck.  There it is.   I know that random things happen, and that statistical probabilities are such that sometimes patterns seem to appear.   But when we say “Good luck!” to someone, I believe we are just wishing them success or safety from accident, without any real appeal to some kind of will or magic that could actually make success happen, or accidents retreat.   I have always believed that feeling “lucky” was merely a state of the mind imputing order and direction to dumb, random occurrence.

In China, I was always embarrassed to say I didn’t believe in luck.   Most Chinese react to such an admission with horror, almost like Americans reacting to a friend who confesses to being an atheist.   Believing in luck for most Chinese is akin to an American’s belief in a God or Providence: a sign that the despite appearances, the universe is ordered and makes sense.  

Once again, population density and scarcity may have a role here.  Despite the Chinese people’s long history of trying to control things and manage outcomes, they have had an inordinate number of disasters: famines, floods, wars, or plagues.  When all is said and done, much of their life appears somewhat random.  An example is traditional Chinese agriculture:  due to the overabundance of workers and relative scarcity of good soils, farming is very labor intensive and involves a high degree of soil amendment, irrigation, and manual weeding and training of plants.  But if the rains don’t fall, or if the rivers flood, all that hard work and control is lost.  So it helps if you consult the geomancer to find the most auspicious, the luckiest, day for planting and for harvesting.

Van Gogh, The Sower

Today’s Gospel reading is Jesus’ Parable of the Sower.  It is about agricultural outcomes, and pictures a very different kind of agriculture, and takes a very different view of luck or even providence.    

Matthew and Luke both follow Mark’s version of the parable, together with its basic interpretation, where the seed is seen as the word of God, the sower a preacher of sorts, and the various soils the different people to whom the word is addressed.  This interpretation is about personal salvation, and the importance of how we react to the Word.  It is almost certainly the product of an early Christian pastor, concerned about how his preaching might be received.

But this is not the meaning the historical Jesus had in mind for the parable.   The seed more likely is about the Kingship or the Reign of God whose arrival Jesus announced, God being in charge of things here and now.   Jesus gave many other parables comparing God’s Reign to some kind of seed: a seed sprouts and grows all on its own regardless of whether the person who planted it knows or understands why it grows (Mark 4:26-34).   Jesus thus says that God’s kingdom comes primarily through God’s acts, not ours, and arrives despite our unawareness. 

Elsewhere, a tiny mustard seed sprouts and grows into a huge tree-like shrub (Mark 4:31; Matt 13:31; Luke 13:19):  tiny, almost imperceptible in its beginnings, huge, overwhelming, and sheltering in its full growth.  That’s God’s Reign.    

In another, God’s Reign is like a field sown with wheat in which is mixed noxious weeds whose young plants are indistinguishable from the good wheat plants (Matt 13:25-40):  we mustn’t try to rip out the bad ones lest we destroy the good ones as well in the process, but rather let God and the angels do the sorting once the plants are fully grown.  Again, God is in charge of the Reign of God, not us. 

In the Parable of the Sower, Jesus pictures a farmer or gardener at work.  But his farmer is not like a Chinese or modern American gardener.   We tend to look at the soil and say:  does it need amendments?  Should we truck in topsoil, and add manure, fertilizer, or compost?  Should we put in raised beds and double dig the soil to get the ideal growing conditions for the various crops?  Where should we plant what to get the right combination of sun and plant complementarity to discourage pests?  How can we manipulate the flow of water to make up for unsteady rain:  irrigation water, sprinklers, or drip systems? 

Ancient Galilean agriculture was less labor and capital intensive, and crop yields were correspondingly more variable in their results.  “A sower goes out to sow seed and casts it all over the place.  Some falls on hard, thin ground with hardly any soil.  It doesn’t sprout.  Some falls on ground with soil, but little water.  It sprouts but quickly dies.  Some falls on rich soil infested with weeds, and it is crowded out by them.  Only some falls into good soil with adequate water and sun and not too many weeds.  And even there, the crop yields, though good, vary greatly. In some areas, it is very, very good.”

We would say that this farmer is foolish:  he wastes his seed stock by profligately casting it about without paying attention of making sure the ground is ready.  But Jesus, along with his ancient compatriots, would say that the farmer is merely doing the best he can with the limited resources given him.  The bumper crop that results in that last good, well-watered soil, vindicates his practice.  

We might be tempted to think that Jesus is saying somehow that the random way the seed falls and produces results from luck.  Bad soil, too hot a sun, too many weeds—all these are like a bad hand drawn unluckily from a deck.  Good crop yields are “luck of the draw,” poor ones, from bad luck.

But the controlling image in Jesus’ society was not luck, but a God in control of everything.   Jesus raises the example of random differences in crop yields to talk about providence.  His point is that when we’re talking about the Reign of God, we’re talking about God.  And God is good.  God is compassionate.  God is loving.  God is fruitful.  God is reliable.  God is provident.  And so the arrival of the reign of God, of God being in charge, is the opposite of random.   It is the opposite of being lucky.  It is the opposite of being chosen.   It is a sure thing. 

We might be able to explain a little why things grow here and not there, but ultimately, what we are dealing is a mystery.  God does what God does, in God’s own good time.

It has to do with God’s basic nature.  “God gives the blessing of rain and sun on the wicked and righteous alike” says Jesus.  Like that crazy loving father with the two wayward sons, a prodigal and a priss, the sower may seem foolish, especially to bean counters who worry about wasted seed stock. 

God is like that sower. We cannot judge God and say that God’s reign is hopelessly delayed, that good is losing and bad is winning.  We can’t say it is just meaningless randomness.  We also can’t say somehow God is picking and choosing, blessing here and punishing there.  The sower cannot be judged by the wasted seed. The garden’s success is not judged by the bad bits.   

Jesus is saying that faith in God’s providence depends on faith in God.  That faith must have patience and be able to see through the dry times, the sparse soils.  It must have a heart full of assurance that in the end, love wins.  God’s reign has come among us, and will only become more and more evident with time.    Our hearts must be faithful because God is faithful.  God’s ultimate intention is to love, to heal and to save.  Simply because it is not yet does not mean it’s not going to happen, or that somehow God is stingy, picky,  capricious.   Much of what prevents God’s reign are those pesky weeds we ourselves cultivate.   “Rejoice for God’s Reign has come” says Jesus, “change your ways and get out of its way!”

I invite us all this week to look at our hopes and desires.  What makes us think that things are never going to get better?  Is it the sluggish economy and the various things that are slowing it?  Is it those poor children coming across our borders and our reaction we must figure out a way to stop them rather than welcome them?  Is it gun violence?  Is it oppression or privilege?  What about our own failings?  What about the sufferings of illness and age that we and our loved ones have to endure day to day?

Again, I invite us to reflect on our unfulfilled hopes and desires.  Let’s look at those rocky, thin-soiled, weed-infested places in our lives and society to try to get a handle of what God’s Reign might be.

Let’s not leave it there, with a list of our unsatisfied hopes and desires.  Let’s then look at ways we can get out God’s way, individually and as a society, and seek ways we can actually help God’s seeds, growing secretly, to flourish openly. 

In the name of God, Amen.