Compassion not Wrath
8 December 2024
Advent 2C
Homily preached at St. Mark’s Episcopal Church
Medford, Oregon
9:00 a.m. Sung Mass
Malachi 3:1-4; Canticle 16; Philippians 1:3-11; Luke 3:1-6
God, let us not accept the judgment that this is all we are.
Stir in our hearts a desire to change—with hope that all of us can change. Break
our hearts of stone and give us hearts of flesh. Amen.
Zechariah in the Temple blesses the
newborn John the Baptist this way:
“You, my child, shall be called the
prophet of the Most High,
for you will go before the Lord to
prepare his way,
To give his people knowledge of
salvation
by the forgiveness of their sins.
In the tender compassion of our God
the dawn from on high shall break
upon us,
To shine on those who dwell in
darkness and the shadow of death,
and to guide our feet into the way
of peace”.
“In the tender compassion of our
God,” John will prepare the way for Jesus whose light will break upon us and lead
us In “the way of peace.”
We live in a world not at peace.
We live in a world very short on compassion. We see how bad things
are and seem able to blame only our enemies, those whom Zechariah calls “those
who hate us.”
We are sick with anger, broken with
wrath.
Look at how we have handled the
electoral campaign--stirring up hatred of foreigners, trans people, and
socialists on the one side and fearful hate of Nazis, fascists, and racists on
the other. And the election’s aftermath: derisive gloating here,
and deep resentment at those who voted differently from us, here. We even hear people
in our own country say that maybe the only solution is what Chairman Mao called
the source of all political power, the barrel of a gun. And on Thursday
this week, we woke to news about the murder of the CEO of one of the nation’s
largest health insurance companies, one that had twice the denial rate of any
other company. The casings of the bullets used had inscribed on them the
words summarizing the policies framed by the murdered man, “delay, deny,
defend.” That’s bad enough, but then we were treated to a chorus of “this
murder was justified,” some of it muted, with moralizing tut-tuts at violence
in the abstract, but cheering nevertheless for real violence.
Anger and wrath, hatred and fear. On
all sides. No matter who started it, no matter who might be the most at
fault, it breaks God’s heart. And it should break ours too.
As I was reminded by dear friends at
St. John’s Cathedral in Hong Kong when Saddam Hussein was killed and beloved
colleagues were celebrating, in Ezekiel we read, “As sure as I am the living
God, I take no pleasure from the death of the wicked. I want the wicked to
change their ways and live. Turn your life around! Reverse your evil ways!”
(Ezek 33:11)
But isn’t wrath an attribute of God?
Isn’t it what is needed in response to patent evil? Isn’t it what “the
Great and Dreadful Day of the Lord,” the Dies Irae, the Day of Wrath, is
all about? About God punishing the wicked? Isn’t that the point of
having John the Baptist appear on 2nd Advent as a dour prophet calling out
“Repent or be punished!”?
I admit it, the idea of wrathful
settling of scores lies behind most of the hopes of ancient Judaism for an
ideal king of the future, an anointed David. Though at times he is called “the
prince of Peace,” the main reason people hoped for a Messiah was that he would
use force to set things right.
The fact is, there are plenty of
things in this world that justify “righteous” anger.
But as justified as anger may seem,
it is something, in the words of Bill Wilson, perhaps better left to healthier
people than we have proven ourselves to be.
The Bible talks a lot about the
wrath of God. But it also says that God is love. Some texts each us to
love our enemies, but others command us to hate the wicked, or at least avoid
them, and ask God to punish and destroy those who cause such harm to us.
We read, “I am a jealous God,
visiting the sins of the wicked on their families for four generations!” But
we also read “God is slow to anger and
of great kindness!”
People try to reconcile these contradictory
texts. Some: God loves the sinner but
hates sin. Some: love is demanding, love is tough. Some: the wrath of God
is placated by Jesus taking the place of the wicked on the cross and suffering
in the stead of those who have faith in him.
In all these views, a bloodthirsty Deity can calm his wrath only through
the shedding of blood, anyone’s blood. Yikes.
These are cheap ways of reconciling
the irreconcilable.
The problem with them is that they keep
focused on God as angry, rather than as loving. The wrath of God is what
destines us, in this view, to a burning lake of fire and brimstone for the
eternities.
Jonathan Edwards’ classic sermon,
“Sinners in the hands of an Angry God” shows us what the doctrine of the
literal wrath of God is:
“The God that holds you over the pit
of hell, much as one holds a spider, or some loathsome insect over the fire,
abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked: his wrath towards you burns like fire;
he looks upon you as worthy of nothing else, but to be cast into the fire; he
is of purer eyes than to bear to have you in his sight; you are ten thousand
times more abominable in his eyes, than the most hateful venomous serpent is in
ours. …[T]here is no other reason to be given, why you have not dropped
into hell since you arose in the morning, but that God’s hand has held you up.
… O sinner! Consider the fearful danger you are in: it is a great furnace of
wrath, a wide and bottomless pit, full of the fire of wrath, that you are held
over in the hand of that God, whose wrath is provoked and incensed as much
against you, as against many of the damned in hell. You hang by a slender
thread, with the flames of divine wrath flashing about it, and ready every
moment to singe it, and burn it asunder…”
Again, Yikes!
This is not God as love. And
it is not the God that Jesus taught.
For Jesus, God is a loving parent,
our abba or papa.
For Jesus, God is a healer, a
physician, not an Emperor, policeman, or a judge in a court of law.
For Jesus, we should not try to
avoid the wicked, but engage them “It is not the well that need a
physician, but the ill.” It isn’t uncleanness we need to worry about, but
rather unkindness, cruelty, and abuse of others. It isn’t boundaries
between neighbors and foreigners that count, but our need to be neighborly to those
who hate us, like that Samaritan.
For such ideas as these, Jesus was
accused of being a sinner himself, spending all his time with whores, drunks,
and greedy traitors.
When we talk about the wrath of God,
just remember that this does not describe the heart of God. Any talk
about God’s emotions or passions should be an affirmation that God is more than
us, not less. God’s wrath as an idea reminds us that justice is a basic
character of God. But it does not mean that God is bloodthirsty, or has
an anger management problem. To take such an image literally would be to
say that God is as messed up as we are, driven to engage in abuse to make a
point or satisfy an interior rage.
No. “The wrath of God”
describes how things feel to us when we are alienated from God. We find
salvation in the cross not by Jesus substituting for us as the literal aim of
God’s rage, but by us participating with the God made man in his mortal sufferings
and ultimate victory over death and the world’s brokenness.
C.S. Lewis, in talking about Hell, that
ultimate image of God’s anger, imagines that it is a condition created by our
own refusal of God’s grace. He puts it this way, “In the end, when all is
said and done, there are two groups of people: those who say to God, ‘Thy
will be done,’ and those to whom God says, ‘alright, have it your own way.’”
Beloved, Jesus taught us to be
compassionate as our Father in heaven is compassionate, not wrathful as God is
seen by wrathful people. He taught us to love our enemies.
For the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King,
Jr.:
“It is impossible even to begin the
act of loving one’s enemies without [first] accept[ing] the necessity, over and
over again, of forgiving those who inflict evil and injury upon us. … The
forgiving act must always be initiated by the person who has been wronged… [It]
does not mean ignoring what has been done or putting a false label on an evil
act. It means, rather, that [we no longer let] the evil act …. remain… as a
barrier to … relationship. Forgiveness [creates the chance] for a fresh start… It
is the lifting of a burden…, the cancelling of…debt. …The evil deed of
the enemy-neighbor, the thing that hurts, never quite expresses all that he is.
An element of goodness may be found even in our worst enemy. Each of us is
something of a schizophrenic personality, tragically divided against ourselves.
A persistent civil war rages within [us all] … There is some good in the worst
of us and some evil in the best of us. When we discover this, we are less prone
to hate our enemies. When we look beneath the surface…, we see within our
enemy-neighbor a measure of goodness and know that [his evil acts are] not
quite representative of all that he is… We know [that, despite all of the
distortions], God’s image is ineffably etched in [him, and that he is] not
beyond the reach of God’s redemptive love. …We must not seek to defeat or
humiliate the enemy but [rather] to win his friendship and understanding. …
Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already
devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that.
Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.”
This is what the elderly Zechariah
is saying: Compassion drives God’s acts toward us, including giving us Jesus as
the embodiment of compassion. By changing our minds and hearts,
repenting, we come to share in Jesus’s compassion. And in this, we
experience rescue from our brokenness, from our slavery to wrath, and find the
way of peace.
Let us pray,
“Gracious Jesus, grant us your
tender compassion. Shine your light on us who dwell in darkness and the
shadow of death. Break our wrathful hearts of stone, and give us
compassionate hearts of flesh. Guide our feet into the way of peace, as
hard as that may appear to us”. Amen.