Waiting
for the Spirit
Seventh Sunday of Easter (Year B)
20th May 2012
Homily Preached at Trinity Episcopal Church
Seventh Sunday of Easter (Year B)
20th May 2012
Homily Preached at Trinity Episcopal Church
Ashland,
Oregon
8:00 a.m. Spoken Eucharist; 10:00 a.m. Sung Eucharist
Acts 1:15-17, 21-26; Psalm 1; 1 John 5:9-13; John 17:6-19
8:00 a.m. Spoken Eucharist; 10:00 a.m. Sung Eucharist
Acts 1:15-17, 21-26; Psalm 1; 1 John 5:9-13; John 17:6-19
In those days Peter stood up among the believers (together the crowd numbered about one hundred twenty persons) and said, "Friends, the scripture had to be fulfilled, which the Holy Spirit through David foretold concerning Judas, who became a guide for those who arrested Jesus-- for he was numbered among us and was allotted his share in this ministry. So one of the men who have accompanied us during all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, beginning from the baptism of John until the day when he was taken up from us-- one of these must become a witness with us to his resurrection." So they proposed two, Joseph called Barsabbas, who was also known as Justus, and Matthias. Then they prayed and said, "Lord, you know everyone's heart. Show us which one of these two you have chosen to take the place in this ministry and apostleship from which Judas turned aside to go to his own place." And they cast lots for them, and the lot fell on Matthias; and he was added to the eleven apostles. (Acts 1:15-17, 21-26)
God,
take away our hearts of stone and give us hearts of flesh. Amen.
I think all of us have memories of long
car trips either as children or with children.
Questions abound. “Are we there
yet?” “How much longer?” “When are we stopping for a potty
break?” “Are we there yet?” “When do we
cross over into the next state?” “Where
will we be eating dinner? What will we
eat?” “Are we there yet?” “Oh, Look--an amusement park! Can we stop, can we?” “ARE WE THERE YET?” Sometimes, the tiresome questions can annoy,
and nerves can fray. “Mom, tell NN to stop it!” “Kids, don’t make we have to come back
there!”
Waiting
is something our modern American culture does not value or particularly equip
us for. We value action, measurable
results—the quicker the better, and taking charge. For many of us, the single image that most
summarizes a failure of government is a long line in a state’s—any
state’s—Department of Motor Vehicles
office where you have to wait to get
to see the person at the service window.
One of the most frequently seen occasions for arguments between a
married couple is where one of them through inattentiveness makes the other one
wait.
But not all cultures share this loathing
of waiting. No one likes to wait, and
“waste one’s time.” But in many
cultures, especially Asian ones, the ability to gracefully manage oneself
during wait times, patience, is
highly valued, and time when you have to wait is seen as an opportunity to
develop this virtue. And when we
Americans live in such cultures, we often react to such values by believing
that the local people are only getting what they deserve when they have to put
up with unreasonably long wastes of time on a daily basis. “You get in a society what you are willing to
tolerate,” they say.
In today’s reading from the Book of Acts, the disciples are in an in-between time where they need to wait for something. Jesus, after his death and bodily reappearance, has been visiting and appearing to them on a regular basis. After forty days, he departs definitively by ascending into the skies, with the clouds and the brilliant light hiding him from the eyes of the disciples. He leaves with a command and a promise: he orders them not to leave Jerusalem, but to wait there until they are “clothed with power from on high” (Luke 24:49) in a promised outpouring of the Holy Spirit, and as he ascends angels declare that he will come again and descend in a like manner (Acts 1:1-11).
So the disciples in today’s story are
in waiting mode, or at least should be
in waiting mode.
But they are unhappy. They know that Jesus called twelve of them to
be special witnesses to the arrival of the Reign of God, that number being
symbolic of a newly constituted and restored people of Israel, with its ancient
twelve tribes. The tribes haven’t been
around for several hundred years; most of them were wiped out and lost at the
time of the Assyrian conquest of Israel in 720-740 B.C.E. During the Last Supper, Jesus had promised
the Twelve that they would sit on twelve thrones and judge the tribes of Israel
(Luke 22:29). But now one of those
twelve chosen special symbols of the newly restored Kingdom of God, Judas
Iscariot, has defected and helped Jesus’ enemies capture him and put him to
death.
So Peter proposes that they fill the
place left by Judas. Now, the truth be
told, if you asked me, it seems that the best person to take this place among
the special twelve witnesses to Jesus would have been Mary Magdalene, since
according to many of the stories, it was she who first saw the Risen Lord. But the society at that time being what it
was, and Peter being who he was, Peter restricts the opening to men. In Luke’s story, Peter gives several criteria
for the replacement—he must be a man,
he must have been a companion of Jesus from the start, and he must have been a
witness of the reappearance of the Risen Lord after his death.
So far so good. The eleven realize that two men, Matthias and
Joseph Barsabbas, meet the criteria. But
they cannot decide who it should be. So they
use the ancient method of determining which animal would be the sacrificial
offering from a group—they draw lots.
And so Matthias it is.
Despite the fact the pre-Christian Dead
Seas Scrolls community had a governing body of Twelve elders, there is absolutely
nothing in the Acts text that suggests that Peter’s intention was that the
Twelve would become a permanent fixture in a permanent Church governance. He and the disciples at this time fully
expected that Jesus would come again quite soon, and the need to find a
replacement for Judas was with the express goal of having the Twelve as a group
ready for that moment, so they could sit on those twelve thrones as judges,
presumably when Jesus returned in glory.
Other than the fact that he clearly
wants to restrict the use of the word “apostle” to just the Twelve, it is not
clear what Luke’s attitude to all this is.
He simply recounts the story in Acts without commentary. But interestingly, this is the last we ever
hear of Matthias. Later on, it is another
person, Paul, who ends up being, along with Peter, as the great witness to
Jesus.
I think that the lesson to be learned
is this. Jesus in ascending had told
them to return to Jerusalem and wait there to receive power from on high. Ten days later, on the great Feast of
Shavuot, or Pentecost, the promised
outpouring of the Spirit would occur.
But in the meantime, the disciples have neither the direct guidance of
the Risen Lord, who has now gone up out of their sight, nor the inspiration of
the Holy Spirit, which has not yet been poured out upon them.
But they are impatient and must
act. And this is a good thing, and they
are trying to do God’s will. But instead
of just waiting, as Jesus commanded, they reconstitute the Twelve. But they are reduced to throwing dice to
actually make the pick. And their action
seems not to have had much effect of the course of the Church thereafter.
It is normal and natural to be impatient, and to want to
take action, especially when it seems that things are coming to a critical
moment. That was clearly the position of
Peter and the Eleven here. And it is not
necessarily a bad thing to actually take the steps that we think are placed
before us even when we appear to be in a place where we need to wait. But we must not let fear or discouragement make us impatient and act out of turn, or intemperately. God’s time is not our own, as much as we would like that to be so.
In the Hebrew Scriptures, there is a key idea—the need we have to be patient and let God do his work in his own good time. Sometimes this means simply trying to get out of the way of God. The Psalmist says, “Wait for the Lord: be brave and strong-hearted, but wait for the Lord” (Psalm 27:14).
Second Isaiah, speaking to the exiles of Judah after they had lost their nation, their temple, and many had lost their trust in Yahweh, said this: “But those who wait upon the Lord will take new strength; they shall soar as on eagles’ wings; when they run, they will not be weary; and when they walk, they will not faint” (Isaiah 40:31).
Sometimes we find
ourselves in over our heads. And like the eleven in this story, direction from
God might not come right away. Our path
may not be clearly set before us. Our
natural inclination is to try to dig ourselves out. Sometimes, that may be simply taking the one
or two simple actions that appear to be within our reach and tend toward what
God intends. Like eating chicken soup
for a cold, it may not necessarily help, “but
it couldn’t hoit.”
When we find ourselves
alone and without direction or comfort, we must not be like those guys in Waiting for Godot, simply repeating
nonsense lines and distracting ourselves from the fact that the anticipated one
does not appear to ever be coming. God
has promised to help, and to guide and direct us. And he will.
But, like people in a DMV line, we mustn’t give up because we don’t like
the discomfort of waiting.
Sometimes we find
that there’s no right way to proceed. We can keep trying to dig ourselves out...
or we can wait patiently for God to help us.
Next week, we will be
celebrating the coming of the Holy Spirit to the Church on the Feast of
Pentecost. That’s because God does act
and send his direction and comfort. He
did it then, and he does it now.
This week in our
prayers, let’s take more time to listen.
In our daily life, let’s take more time to be patient. Because patience is a virtue, and a gift from
God, one of the signs of Love’s presence in our lives.
In
the name of Christ, Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment