Tuesday, April 30, 2019

Living God (May 2019 Trinitarian article)





Living God
Fr. Tony’s Letter to the Trinitarians
May, 2019

“It is always shocking to meet life where we thought we were alone. ‘Look out!’ we cry, ‘it’s alive.’ … [T]his is the very point at which so many draw back—I would have done so myself if I could—and proceed no further with Christianity. An ‘impersonal God’—well and good. A subjective God of beauty, truth and goodness, inside our own heads—better still. A formless life-force surging through us, a vast power which we can tap—best of all. But God Himself, alive, pulling at the other end of the cord, perhaps approaching at an infinite speed, the hunter, king, husband—that is quite another matter. There comes a moment when the children who have been playing at burglars hush suddenly: was that a real footstep in the hall? There comes a moment when people who have been dabbling in religion (‘[Our] search for God’!) suddenly draw back. Supposing we really found Him? We never meant it to come to that! Worse still, supposing He had found us!”
–C.S. Lewis, Miracles


I had a parishioner once tell me the hardest thing he experienced in the death of his wife was this:  the memory of the beloved was fixed, locked in the past.  No longer could she surprise him, or actively argue with him, or be changed by his words or change him with hers.  He might have a conversation with her when no one else was looking, to be sure, but it was a conversation with his memory of her, the image she had left of herself in his mind.  “When people say the dead live on in our hearts and our memories, they miss what is most important about personality—that it grows, responds to change, and acts on its own regardless of how we expect. I want my wife living and breathing beside me, a subject and not an object, sharing and capable of accepting sharing from me. The dead we do not see seem to grow further and further from us.” 

Another parishioner, this time one at Trinity, told me that his greatest problem with how the resurrection of Jesus was understood by Marcus Borg and Dominic Crossan was that though they accept a post-Easter living Jesus as an object of belief and faith, they seem to reject him as an active living person, a subject rather than an object.    Though this may oversimplify their views, it makes the point very clear:  the resurrected Lord is not merely a memory or myth.  The living Lord is an active personality, the one who reaches out to us and reacts to us.    

One of the main reasons we tend to reject the idea of a real bodily coming forth of Jesus from among the dead, or even the idea of Almighty God as personal, living, and active, is this:  Jesus as a mere icon or myth and God as an idealized life-force are both tame, emotionally easier for us to control.

Accepting the reality of the resurrection and accepting the core Biblical faith of a living God means putting ourselves at risk.  “Watch out!  It’s alive!”  The Living God asks us to do hard things.  The Resurrected Jesus leads us on the Way of the Cross.   Now falling in love or having children both entail great risk, and are scary.  But they are rich in their rewards.  And so it is with a Living God and the Resurrected Lord: not bound merely to our conceptions and memories, they can actively surprise us, challenge us, and give us what we need at the moment.   And the risk?  Well, we Christians believe that we see the face of God in Jesus, the one who said, “I will give you rest.  My yoke is easy, my burden light.”  In loosing the bonds of death and human brokenness itself, Jesus makes it possible for us to hope that we may indeed once again truly be with those we love but now see no longer, not merely as objects of memory, but as active, living beings. 

Thanks be to God. 
Fr. Tony+

No comments:

Post a Comment