Sunday, October 27, 2019

Two Kinds of Lonely (Proper 25c)



Two Kinds of Lonely
Twentieth Sunday after Pentecost (Proper 25 Year C RCL)
27 October 2019--8:00 a.m. Said, 10:00 a.m. Sung Mass
Parish Church of Trinity, Ashland (Oregon)

God, give us hearts to feel and love,
take away our hearts of stone
and give us hearts of flesh. Amen.

A popular song when I was a teenager went, “I'm in with the in crowd, I go where the in crowd goes.  I'm in with the in crowd and I know what the in crowd knows.”

Once, the executive of a senior political leader took me aside and said,  “Listen I know that you’re not like those others. They just don’t get it.  But you do, and I’m sure you can do this just like our boss wants.”  

Another time, in the rarefied air of a research institute in religion, a senior professor said to us graduate students, “We are knowledgeable and can handle the truth.   The many out there—pffff—forget about them.  Tell them whatever convenient simplicity will keep them happy.” 

Yet another time, I met with my boss Ambassador Jon Huntsman and the senior editor of a major fashion magazine.   In every phrase and gesture, every choice of clothing and mannerism, she passed the message, all so graciously, “We are better than all those little people out there, and we have a responsibility to lead.”   

Today’s Gospel is a parable that Jesus told against “those who belittled others because they thought they were better than they.” 
Two men who go to the Temple to pray: One is a Pharisee who keeps all the laws, an upright member of the community.  The other is a Tax Collector—a traitor, collaborator with the hated Romans, who gouges money for his own profit.  The parable praises the evil man and condemns the righteous. 

There are three ways that we commonly misread this parable.

The first is that Jesus is condemning in general the Pharisees, forerunners of all rabbinic Judaism, as heartless hypocrites.  But at the time of Jesus, the Pharisees were generally seen as the most sincere, humble and open of the various Jewish sects.  Jesus is closer to them than any other group.  The point here is not to criticize Pharisees, but rather shock the listener into new understanding by contrasting an upstanding lover of God with a wicked traitor.

The second misreading is that Jesus is praising the Tax Collector’s chest-beating, over-wrought guilt as the one-size-fits-all proper approach to God.   This view is fostered and popularized by the grim pessimism of Saint Augustine, John Calvin, and Martin Luther.   But when Jesus approaches the truly wretched, he does not beat up on them and tell them to further abase themselves. To such people, Jesus announces the jubilant arrival of God’s Reign.

The third misreading is that Jesus here is trying to teach salvation by grace alone apart from works, again, usually as contained in the writings of those pessimistic three. While this parable may provide a facile proof-text for such a doctrine, there is nothing in it to suggest that deeds do not matter.

So what does it mean? 
  
Jesus’ parables regularly turn things upside down.   An honored and righteous priest and Levite pass by a gravely injured fellow Jew, and it is a hated and loathed Samaritan that finally helps the poor man.   A shameless father, unconcerned about his honor, runs out and hugs, and then throws a big party for, a troubled son who had as much wished him dead and then frivolously spent half of his estate on detested vices.   

Jesus chooses shocking images to represent God at work:  the Reign of God is not seen as a great cedar tree or vine, but rather a vile mustard weed; ritually suspect yeast represents the Kingdom at work, not pure, unleavened Passover loaves.   Such scenes shock us out of our regular ways of thinking, and make us stand in wonder at God at work in the world around.




The righteous Pharisee stands in the center of things as he thanks God that he is not like all the other sinners around, drawing attention to himself, so that he can point out the differences between him from and those other “little” people.

The Tax Collector stands “afar off” to the side, out of shame.  He doesn’t dare raise his eyes up to heaven, and simply asks God “have mercy on me, a sinner.” He is one of the telones, a class of entrepreneurs who collected tolls, surcharges, and head taxes.  They were a rough lot, closer to what we would call the “muscle” of a loan shark operation than an IRS agent. They are traitors to their people.  This is what the tax collector bemoans as he beats his breast.

Jesus says that it is the Tax Collector and not the Pharisee who went out of the Temple that day having been made right with God.  Why? 

Jesus has chosen two stereotypes here:  the righteous, pious, and socially responsible Pharisee and the irreligious, unscrupulous, and morally tainted Tax Collector.

The difference between the two is in their hearts.  Though both stand by themselves, though both are lonely, there are two kinds of lonely here.  The Pharisee isolates himself because he has contempt for others and thinks he is better than everyone else.  The Tax Collector is lonely because he is ashamed and isolated because others look down on him, and he recognizes that perhaps they are right.  His standing far off is actually an act of solidarity with other people, recognizing their judgment of him.  So the loneliness of the Pharisee drives him away from other people and from God.  The loneliness of the Tax Collector drives him toward other people and God. 

There are not just two kinds of lonely.  When we think of the Pharisee and the Tax Collector and which one was closer to God, which one was neared to God, we need to remember that there are two different kinds of nearness also: what C.S. Lewis calls nearness of proximity and nearness of approach.

A hiker in the mountains comes out onto a ledge and sees, there beneath her, the small town where she wants to spend the night. It is only about 500 meters away—straight down. To get there, she must continue on the path, with its switchbacks and gradual descent. At moments, she must actually go farther and farther away from her goal—800 meters, 1400 meters as the crow flies—before the switchback turns. But all the time, she is actually getting closer to her evening resting spot. 

Jesus’ point in contrasting the two men in the Temple is that from the point of view of nearness of proximity, the Pharisee is much closer to God than the Tax Collector, but from the point of view of nearness of approach, and this is in the long run the only thing that counts—the Tax Collector is nearer to God by far, despite appearances and what stereotypes tell us to expect. 

The Pharisee here, against the better teachings of his own tradition, has let his contempt for others and his desire to be better than others close his heart.  The Tax Collector, against all expectation, senses that he is in this with all the others.

In a word, the Pharisee here is unable to get any closer to God or to his fellows.  The Tax Collector has made a start at both. 

If there is any such thing as an eternal hell, I believe its doors are locked not from the outside by God, but from the inside by the people suffering there. They do so because they persist in rejecting the love of God, afraid of accepting that they are in this with all the rest, one of God’s beloved creatures.

Better a wicked person who knows he or she  is one sorry mess than a “righteous” one with no clue as to how hard his or her heart has become.  This is the idea Jesus seeks to convey in the parable.   The self-satisfied religious, singing “I’m in with the in crowd,” is unwilling to relate to others except as inferiors, as “little” people.

I pray that all of us this week can find ways to connect with others in our lives, especially those upon whom we look down upon. Looking down upon anyone is a sign of dire spiritual illness, a sickness unto death. It might be best to learn to root it out of our minds, and erase it from our hearts.

In the name of Christ,  Amen. 

 
-->

No comments:

Post a Comment