Kind
Pelicans
Fr.
Tony’s Midweek Message
July
15, 2020
Elena
and I are at the beach on a small vacation, masked and distanced at 6 feet from
others. Yesterday we saw a large group
of pelicans fly in and land in the water in front of us, and then dive, hunt,
and return to the surface to feast on fish for a half an hour. Sitting amazed at the joyful, almost playful
scene, my thoughts wandered: pelicans, despite all their smelly, noisy selves,
have for almost 1500 years been symbols for Christians of our Lord. I have a chasuble with a large embroidered
emblem of a pelican feeding her young.
Like
many birds, pelicans eat and partially digest their food and then regurgitate
it, often red from the blood of the prey, to feed their hatchlings. But pelicans are larger and people can see
this messy behavior, though they cannot usually get close enough to see exactly
what’s going on given the bird’s aggressive defense of its own space. In
the pre-Christian classical world, the behavior was mistaken for the mother
pelican wounding her breast and feeding her chicks with her own blood. So when Christians came on the scene, this
image of a self-sacrificing, caring, loving parent was understood as a type or
allegorical figure for Christ.
The
image even made it into one verse of St. Thomas Aquinas’ great Eucharistic
hymn, Adoro te devote (Humbly I adore
Thee, Verity Unseen):
Pie Pelicane, Jesu Domine,Me immundum munda tuo Sanguine:Cujus una stilla salvum facereTotum mundum quit ab omni scelere.Gentle Pelican, Lord JesuWash me clean with your bloodOne drop of which makes safeThe whole world, from every evil.
Some
find it strange to preserve and use a Christological image that is based on a
biological misunderstanding: pelicans do
not wound themselves to feed their children.
But there is a deeper matter at issue:
God reveals Godself to us in our own language, in our own cultural
tradition, and sometimes that means that God’s revelation is mixed up with
strange and fanciful things later proven to be not so. But that does not take away the truth of
revelation, it merely places it in context.
Historically, it made such truth accessible.
It
is easy to blame the past, and think we are so much more clever and morally
justified than those who went on before.
We can see it in some of the excesses of today’s “cancel culture” that,
though rightly seeking to remove from our current common life images and
symbols that endorse and support systemic oppression, occasionally wants to rid
our collective life unreflectively of all images from the past that may not be
up to snuff by today’s lights of justice and fairness. But those who went before were, like us,
imperfect and flawed. And we, like them,
will be found wanting by tomorrow’s standards in ways that we can barely
predict today. The issue is not whether
a historical figure was perfect or completely “woke,” but rather 1) whether they
worked to end the injustice they may have, as people of their age, benefited
from, and 2) whether our use of them as heroes or heroines, saints or blessed
ones, or monuments, actually gets us closer to fulfilling God’s intentions for
us. All that is demanded of us, says
Micah, is to love compassion, do justice, and walk humbly before God.
Grace
and peace,
Fr.
Tony+
No comments:
Post a Comment